These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8404247)

  • 1. Child welfare services for the catastrophically ill newborn: Part II--A guiding ethical paradigm.
    Hughes RC
    Child Welfare; 1993; 72(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 8404247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond the threshold of life. Treating and non-treating of critically ill newborns in The Netherlands.
    Huibers AK
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):227-45. PubMed ID: 7636404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
    Johnstone BV
    Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
    Shapiro RS
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International symposium on critically ill newborns. An overview and introduction.
    Blank RH
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 7636401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
    Gostin L
    Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of critically ill newborns in Australia.
    Blank RH
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 7636403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns.
    Brooks BF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
    Ciulla JB
    Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Child welfare services for the catastrophically ill newborn: Part I--A confusion of responsibility.
    Hughes RC
    Child Welfare; 1993; 72(4):323-40. PubMed ID: 8348844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baby Ryan and virtual futility.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 7782197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The real challenge of "Baby Doe": considering the sanctity and quality of life.
    Goldworth A; Stevenson DK
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1989 Mar; 28(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 2920487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care management of children with cognitive and physical disabilities: to treat or not to treat.
    Mims J; Crisham P
    J Neurosurg Nurs; 1996 Aug; 28(4):238-51. PubMed ID: 11660803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based ethics and the care of premature infants.
    Tyson J
    Future Child; 1995; 5(1):197-213. PubMed ID: 7633863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment".
    Gerry MH
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):15-66. PubMed ID: 2931398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Care of critically ill newborns in India. Legal and ethical issues.
    Subramanian KN; Paul VK
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):263-75. PubMed ID: 7636406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Triage in neonatal intensive care: the limitations of a metaphor.
    Childress JF
    Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):547-61. PubMed ID: 11651809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal and ethical issues concerning treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Johnson V
    Loyola Law Rev; 1985; 30(4):925-51. PubMed ID: 11651874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary.
    Tucker BP
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 2149130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.