These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Assessing burdens and benefits of medical care. Bullock W Origins; 1992 Jan; 21(34):553-5. PubMed ID: 11652608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Our failing reverence for life. Hall E; Cameron P Psychol Today; 1976 Apr; 9(11):104-106+. PubMed ID: 11662993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments. Crossley M Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Ethical issues presented by children with congenital anomalies. Segal S Semin Perinatol; 1992 Dec; 16(6):369-73. PubMed ID: 1293741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Ethical issues in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Fost N Pediatr Ann; 1981 Oct; 10(10):16-22. PubMed ID: 7312441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The handicapped child. Gray OP Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 11651892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws. Peters PG Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1997; 91(3):798-864. PubMed ID: 11660527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Withdrawing or withholding medical care from premature infants: who should decide, and how? Stokley J Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Dec; (190):9-37. PubMed ID: 10172186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The second Baby Doe rule. Kopelman LM JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(6):843-4. PubMed ID: 3336197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Playing God in the NICU. Ethical guidelines focus on what seems best for the handicapped infant--Saint Vincent Health Center, Erie, PA. Drane JF Health Prog; 1989 Mar; 70(2):26-31. PubMed ID: 10318203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Assisted suicide: a disability perspective. National Council on Disability. Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(3):273-300. PubMed ID: 9949645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations. Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody. Savage T; Michalak DR Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quality and sanctity of life in the Talmud and the Midrash. Tendler MD; Rosner F Tradition; 1993; 28(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 11652685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]