These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8404369)

  • 1. Application of artificial neural networks to chromosome classification.
    Errington PA; Graham J
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(6):627-39. PubMed ID: 8404369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An expert diagnostic system based on neural networks and image analysis techniques in the field of automated cytogenetics.
    Beksaç MS; Eskiizmirliler S; Cakar AN; Erkmen AM; Dağdeviren A; Lundsteen C
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Mar; 3(4):217-29. PubMed ID: 8705397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification.
    Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of chromosomes using a probabilistic neural network.
    Sweeney WP; Musavi MT; Guidi JN
    Cytometry; 1994 May; 16(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8033731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of EEG signals using neural network and logistic regression.
    Subasi A; Erçelebi E
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 May; 78(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 15848265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple neural network response variability as a predictor of neural network accuracy for chromosome recognition.
    Leon MA; Gader P; Keller J
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1996; 32():31-7. PubMed ID: 8672685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chromosome image enhancement using multiscale differential operators.
    Wang YP; Wu Q; Castleman KR; Xiong Z
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 May; 22(5):685-93. PubMed ID: 12846437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chromosome classification using backpropagation neural networks.
    Cho JM
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2000; 19(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10659427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic seizure detection in EEG using logistic regression and artificial neural network.
    Alkan A; Koklukaya E; Subasi A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Oct; 148(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 16023730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ECG beat recognition using fuzzy hybrid neural network.
    Osowski S; Linh TH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 48(11):1265-71. PubMed ID: 11686625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Centromere attribute integration based chromosome polarity assignment.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Caldwell CW; Gader P
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():284-8. PubMed ID: 8947673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatically inferred Markov network models for classification of chromosomal band pattern structures.
    Granum E; Thomason MG
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 2307060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A neural network approach to automatic chromosome classification.
    Jennings AM; Graham J
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Jul; 38(7):959-70. PubMed ID: 8372108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On fully automatic feature measurement for banded chromosome classification.
    Piper J; Granum E
    Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 2714109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of a high-resolution TV-microscope system to estimate the sequence of centromere separation in muntjak chromosomes.
    Gerlach B; Solleder E; Haucke M; Harms H; Schmid M; Aus HM
    Cytometry; 1984 Nov; 5(6):562-71. PubMed ID: 6549158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Classifier of domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) automatic chromosome identification].
    Stefanova VN; Zenina MN
    Tsitologiia; 2014; 56(10):779-84. PubMed ID: 25711088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removing irrelevant features in neural network classification using evolutionary computations.
    Ciuca I; Ware JA; Cristea A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt A():391-5. PubMed ID: 10179580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic target recognition using a feature-decomposition and data-decomposition modular neural network.
    Wang LC; Der SZ; Nasrabadi NM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 1998; 7(8):1113-21. PubMed ID: 18276328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.