These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 840454)

  • 1. Assessment of factors constituting an "inducibility profile".
    Harrison RF; Flynn M; Craft I
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Mar; 49(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 840454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prelabor evaluation of inducibility.
    Lange AP; Secher NJ; Westergaard JG; Skovgård I
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Aug; 60(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 7155472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
    Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The unfavorable cervix in prolonged pregnancy.
    Harris BA; Huddleston JF; Sutliff G; Perlis HW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 6866359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in cervical nitric oxide concentration correlate with Bishop score and cervical length modifications in prostaglandin E2-mediated induction of labor.
    Chiossi G; Verocchi G; Venturini P; Facchinetti F
    J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2006 Apr; 13(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 16638591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix.
    Xenakis EM; Piper JM; Conway DL; Langer O
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 9241300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Currently used oxytocin regimen outcome measures at term & postterm. II: Outcome indicators in relation to Bishop Score & other covariates.
    Berhan Y; Dwivedi AD
    Ethiop Med J; 2007 Jul; 45(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 18330324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Birth readiness of the uterine cervix. II. Cervix readiness score and its problems because of the variability of individual criteria].
    Lamberti G
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1982 Oct; 186(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 6891151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening before induction of labour.
    Halle H
    Acta Chir Hung; 1987; 28(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 3473857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cervical maturation and induction of labor with PgE2 gel. Authors' experience].
    Carta G; Vigilante M; Di Cesare S; Mascaretti G; Caserta D; Moscarini M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Oct; 49(10):427-32. PubMed ID: 9463175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pattern of cervical dilatation in previous lower segment caesarean section patients.
    Guleria K; Dhall GI; Dhall K
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1997 May; 95(5):131-4. PubMed ID: 9357257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining cervical ripeness and labor outcome: the efficacy of magnetic resonance T2 relaxation times.
    Pates JA; Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; Babcock EE; McIntire DD; Twickler DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):326-30. PubMed ID: 17267832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Assessment of Bishop's pelvic score in induction of labor prognosis].
    Nashar S; Dimitrov A; Nikolov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 16637296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Labor induction with an unfavorable cervix by the modified Krause method].
    Benavides de la Garza L; Cerda Hinojosa J; Benavides de Anda L
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1994 Sep; 62():259-61. PubMed ID: 7959150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of cervix condition according to Bishop score in post term pregnancy.
    Semczuk M; Lopucka M
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 1986; 41():125-31. PubMed ID: 3154047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Induced labor with prostaglandins: 0.5 mg PGE2 intracervical gel versus 3 mg PGE2 vaginal tablet].
    Müller T; Rempen A
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995; 199(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 7725767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
    Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The different elements constituting the Bishop score in the induction of labour with epidural analgesia (author's transl)].
    Sadoul G; Beuret T; Lewin D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1981; 10(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 7264258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.