These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8405136)

  • 1. A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 15(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 8405136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach.
    Anderson G; Fields HW; Beck M; Chacon G; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 16808567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methods for the comparison of measurements derived from orthodontic imaging.
    Krummenauer F; Doll G
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 10920558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL; Silveira HE
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite-element morphometry of soft tissue morphology in subjects with untreated Class III malocclusions.
    Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 10371426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of the relative parallelism of occlusal plane to three ala-tragal lines in various skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric study.
    Venugopalan SK; SatishBabu CL; Rani MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 23649052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new cephalometric parameter to aid in dental base relationship analysis.
    Sarhan OA
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 2316907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative cephalometric errors for orthodontic and surgical patients.
    Wah PL; Cooke MS; Hägg U
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9081997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Correlation analysis on the malocclusion and articulation of skeletal angle III malocclusion in mixed dentition].
    Wang LL; Yang JF; Chen J; Liu XQ; Fan CH; Liu J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 16999349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric investigation of Class III dentoalveolar malocclusion.
    Szuhanek C; Gâdea Paraschivescu E; Sişu AM; Motoc A
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(4):1343-6. PubMed ID: 22203944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cranial-base morphology in children with class III malocclusion.
    Chang HP; Hsieh SH; Tseng YC; Chou TM
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2005 Apr; 21(4):159-65. PubMed ID: 15909671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric errors: a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs.
    Cooke MS; Wei SH
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Feb; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 2029231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critical appraisal of measurement of the soft tissue outline using photographs and video.
    Benson PE; Richmond S
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 19(4):397-409. PubMed ID: 9308261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis.
    Trpkova B; Major P; Prasad N; Nebbe B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 9267228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.