These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8405529)

  • 1. Quality assurance for sperm concentration using latex beads.
    Peters AJ; Zaneveld LJ; Jeyendran RS
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Oct; 60(4):702-5. PubMed ID: 8405529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement and internal quality assurance of the Neubauer hemocytometer and Makler chamber for human sperm concentration determination.
    Costa AF; Onofre FBM; Onofre ASC
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2024 Jun; 28(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 38530757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality evaluation of three different sperm counting chambers].
    Lu J; Lü N; Huang Y; Li PS; Fisch H
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Oct; 10(10):755-7, 760. PubMed ID: 15562789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the accuracy of different sperm counting chambers by performing strict counts of photographed beads.
    Shiran E; Stoller J; Blumenfeld Z; Feigin PD; Makler A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Aug; 12(7):434-42. PubMed ID: 8574071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of chamber characteristics on the reliability of sperm concentration and movement measurements obtained by manual and videomicrographic analysis.
    Ginsburg KA; Armant DR
    Fertil Steril; 1990 May; 53(5):882-7. PubMed ID: 2332061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of 10 different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration.
    Mahmoud AM; Depoorter B; Piens N; Comhaire FH
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Aug; 68(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 9240267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of semen counting chambers as determined by the use of latex beads.
    Seaman EK; Goluboff E; BarChama N; Fisch H
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Oct; 66(4):662-5. PubMed ID: 8816636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delay in the application of the cover glass is a potential source of error with the Makler Counting Chamber.
    Matson P; Irving J; Zuvela E; Hughes R
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Sep; 72(3):559-61. PubMed ID: 10519637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of four chambers to measure sperm concentration: results from an external quality assurance programme.
    Zuvela E; Matson P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Oct; 41(4):671-678. PubMed ID: 32843307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrepancies in sperm count using improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers.
    Imade GE; Towobola OA; Sagay AS; Otubu JA
    Arch Androl; 1993; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8373281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers.
    Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hansen C
    Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 15710187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a new disposable counting chamber.
    Coetzee K; Menkveld R
    Arch Androl; 2001; 47(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 11554687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparing the sperm concentration determined by the Makler and the Neubauer chambers].
    Cardona-Maya W; Berdugo J; Cadavid A
    Actas Urol Esp; 2008 Apr; 32(4):443-5. PubMed ID: 18540267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of Makler counting chamber in semen analysis].
    Tomoyoshi T; Ishida A; Kim CJ
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Nov; 34(11):1931-3. PubMed ID: 3242367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two methods for the measurement of sperm concentration.
    Sokol RZ; Shulman P; Paulson RJ
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Mar; 73(3):591-4. PubMed ID: 10689018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy Evaluation of The Depth of Six Kinds of Sperm Counting Chambers for both Manual and Computer-Aided Semen Analyses.
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Int J Fertil Steril; 2016; 9(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 26985341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparative study of the white cell pipette method and the Makler counting chamber method of counting spermatozoa].
    Menkveld R; Van Zyl JA; Stander FS; Conradie E; Kopper K
    S Afr Med J; 1980 Sep; 58(13):536-8. PubMed ID: 6893501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.