These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8405778)
1. Reliability of using fewer rabbits to evaluate dermal irritation potential of industrial chemicals. Derelanko MJ; Finegan CE; Dunn BJ Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1993 Aug; 21(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 8405778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals. Eskes C; Cole T; Hoffmann S; Worth A; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):603-19. PubMed ID: 18186668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of ocular irritancy potential from dermal irritation test results. Williams SJ Food Chem Toxicol; 1984 Feb; 22(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 6538165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro model for detecting skin irritants: methyl green-pyronine staining of human skin explant cultures. Jacobs JJ; Lehé C; Cammans KD; Das PK; Elliott GR Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Oct; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 12206825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety. Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple method for screening assessment of skin and eye irritation. Sekizawa J; Yasuhara K; Suyama Y; Yamanaka S; Tobe M; Nishimura M J Toxicol Sci; 1994 Feb; 19(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 8207760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals. Stobbe JL; Drake KD; Maier KJ Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12745991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: "Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals". Ulmer WR Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(6):475-6; author response 476-8. PubMed ID: 14680995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Draize test and alternative methods for evaluating irritation from chemical substances]. Moskalewski S; Mystkowska ET; Kiss E Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1995; 46(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8533034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An eye irritation test protocol and an evaluation and classification system. Gupta KC; Chambers WA; Green S; Hill RN; Hurley PM; Lambert LA; Liu PT; Lowther DK; Seabaugh VM; Springer JA Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 8449456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing the number of rabbits in the Draize eye irritancy test: a statistical analysis of 155 studies conducted over 6 years. Talsma DM; Leach CL; Hatoum NS; Gibbons RD; Roger JC; Garvin PJ Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1988 Jan; 10(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 3350224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-house validation of the EpiOcular(TM) eye irritation test and its combination with the bovine corneal opacity and permeability test for the assessment of ocular irritation. Kolle SN; Kandárová H; Wareing B; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R Altern Lab Anim; 2011 Sep; 39(4):365-87. PubMed ID: 21942548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing concepts of ocular irritation evaluation: pitfalls and progress. Williams SJ Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 4040064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative methods for eye and skin irritation tests: an overview. Vinardell MP; Mitjans M J Pharm Sci; 2008 Jan; 97(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 17701961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test. Spielmann H; Hoffmann S; Liebsch M; Botham P; Fentem JH; Eskes C; Roguet R; Cotovio J; Cole T; Worth A; Heylings J; Jones P; Robles C; Kandárová H; Gamer A; Remmele M; Curren R; Raabe H; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):559-601. PubMed ID: 18186667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches. Scott L; Eskes C; Hoffmann S; Adriaens E; Alepée N; Bufo M; Clothier R; Facchini D; Faller C; Guest R; Harbell J; Hartung T; Kamp H; Varlet BL; Meloni M; McNamee P; Osborne R; Pape W; Pfannenbecker U; Prinsen M; Seaman C; Spielmann H; Stokes W; Trouba K; Berghe CV; Goethem FV; Vassallo M; Vinardell P; Zuang V Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19490935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol. Kandárová H; Bendova H; Letasiova S; Coleman KP; De Jong WH; Jírova D Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Aug; 50():433-438. PubMed ID: 29462660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of variability in the rabbit skin irritation assay. Rooney JP; Choksi NY; Ceger P; Daniel AB; Truax J; Allen D; Kleinstreuer N Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104920. PubMed ID: 33757807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dermal and ocular irritation studies of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) venom. Han SM; Lee KG; Yeo JH; Pak SC Am J Chin Med; 2012; 40(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 22809032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of concentration, exposure duration, and patch occlusivity upon rabbit primary dermal irritation indices. Gilman MR; Evans RA; De Salva SJ Drug Chem Toxicol; 1978; 1(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 755678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]