166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8405778)
1. Reliability of using fewer rabbits to evaluate dermal irritation potential of industrial chemicals.
Derelanko MJ; Finegan CE; Dunn BJ
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1993 Aug; 21(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 8405778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals.
Eskes C; Cole T; Hoffmann S; Worth A; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):603-19. PubMed ID: 18186668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of ocular irritancy potential from dermal irritation test results.
Williams SJ
Food Chem Toxicol; 1984 Feb; 22(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 6538165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro model for detecting skin irritants: methyl green-pyronine staining of human skin explant cultures.
Jacobs JJ; Lehé C; Cammans KD; Das PK; Elliott GR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Oct; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 12206825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple method for screening assessment of skin and eye irritation.
Sekizawa J; Yasuhara K; Suyama Y; Yamanaka S; Tobe M; Nishimura M
J Toxicol Sci; 1994 Feb; 19(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 8207760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals.
Stobbe JL; Drake KD; Maier KJ
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12745991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: "Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals".
Ulmer WR
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(6):475-6; author response 476-8. PubMed ID: 14680995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Draize test and alternative methods for evaluating irritation from chemical substances].
Moskalewski S; Mystkowska ET; Kiss E
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1995; 46(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8533034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An eye irritation test protocol and an evaluation and classification system.
Gupta KC; Chambers WA; Green S; Hill RN; Hurley PM; Lambert LA; Liu PT; Lowther DK; Seabaugh VM; Springer JA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 8449456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing the number of rabbits in the Draize eye irritancy test: a statistical analysis of 155 studies conducted over 6 years.
Talsma DM; Leach CL; Hatoum NS; Gibbons RD; Roger JC; Garvin PJ
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1988 Jan; 10(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 3350224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-house validation of the EpiOcular(TM) eye irritation test and its combination with the bovine corneal opacity and permeability test for the assessment of ocular irritation.
Kolle SN; Kandárová H; Wareing B; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Altern Lab Anim; 2011 Sep; 39(4):365-87. PubMed ID: 21942548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing concepts of ocular irritation evaluation: pitfalls and progress.
Williams SJ
Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 4040064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative methods for eye and skin irritation tests: an overview.
Vinardell MP; Mitjans M
J Pharm Sci; 2008 Jan; 97(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 17701961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test.
Spielmann H; Hoffmann S; Liebsch M; Botham P; Fentem JH; Eskes C; Roguet R; Cotovio J; Cole T; Worth A; Heylings J; Jones P; Robles C; Kandárová H; Gamer A; Remmele M; Curren R; Raabe H; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):559-601. PubMed ID: 18186667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches.
Scott L; Eskes C; Hoffmann S; Adriaens E; Alepée N; Bufo M; Clothier R; Facchini D; Faller C; Guest R; Harbell J; Hartung T; Kamp H; Varlet BL; Meloni M; McNamee P; Osborne R; Pape W; Pfannenbecker U; Prinsen M; Seaman C; Spielmann H; Stokes W; Trouba K; Berghe CV; Goethem FV; Vassallo M; Vinardell P; Zuang V
Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19490935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol.
Kandárová H; Bendova H; Letasiova S; Coleman KP; De Jong WH; Jírova D
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Aug; 50():433-438. PubMed ID: 29462660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of variability in the rabbit skin irritation assay.
Rooney JP; Choksi NY; Ceger P; Daniel AB; Truax J; Allen D; Kleinstreuer N
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104920. PubMed ID: 33757807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dermal and ocular irritation studies of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) venom.
Han SM; Lee KG; Yeo JH; Pak SC
Am J Chin Med; 2012; 40(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 22809032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of concentration, exposure duration, and patch occlusivity upon rabbit primary dermal irritation indices.
Gilman MR; Evans RA; De Salva SJ
Drug Chem Toxicol; 1978; 1(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 755678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
