These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8405843)

  • 1. [Reviewers: arbiters or consultants?].
    Naccarella F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Jul; 23(7):748-51. PubMed ID: 8405843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transparent peer review--an appreciation of the reviewers' contribution to a published article.
    Linder S; Schliwa M; Werner S; Gebauer D
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2010 Nov; 89(11):779. PubMed ID: 20813427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistics, authors, and reviewers: the heart of the matter.
    Curran-Everett D; Benos DJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):80. PubMed ID: 19261765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ups and downs of peer review.
    Benos DJ; Bashari E; Chaves JM; Gaggar A; Kapoor N; LaFrance M; Mans R; Mayhew D; McGowan S; Polter A; Qadri Y; Sarfare S; Schultz K; Splittgerber R; Stephenson J; Tower C; Walton RG; Zotov A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17562902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it?
    Relman AS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 2260288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist.
    Duchesne S; Jannin P
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1783-7. PubMed ID: 18053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Basic philosophy and concepts underlying scientific peer review.
    Stehbens WE
    Med Hypotheses; 1999 Jan; 52(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10342668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editors' review of 2006 and the BJCP prize.
    Aronson JK; Lennard MS; Ritter JM; Begg EJ; Lewis LD; Schachter M
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17229039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cultivating peer review.
    Dellavalle RP
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 55(6):1113-5. PubMed ID: 17097410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to evaluate and acknowledge a scientific journal peer reviewer: a proposed index to measure the performance of reviewers.
    Messias AMV; Lira RPC; Furtado JMF; Paula JS; Rocha EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2017; 80(6):V. PubMed ID: 29267566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer Reviewers Advance Excellence in Infusion Nursing.
    Alexander M
    J Infus Nurs; 2019; 42(2):59. PubMed ID: 30817420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.