These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 840608)

  • 1. Capacity sharing and refractoriness in successive reactions.
    Kafry D; Kahneman D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Feb; 44(1):327-35. PubMed ID: 840608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for psychological refractory effect in motor inhibition for a dual-response Go/No-Go task.
    Muroi M; Naito E; Matsumura M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Oct; 85(2):563-8. PubMed ID: 9347543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the complexity of S2 have any effect upon RT1? A controversy in the PRP literature.
    Franks IM; Canil J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Dec; 61(3 Pt 1):779-86. PubMed ID: 4088769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equivalency of reaction times for simple and primed tasks.
    Hart MA; Reeve TG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 17055991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The psychological refractory period in Parkinson's disease.
    Hsieh S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):893-902. PubMed ID: 11153866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck.
    Schumacher EH; Seymour TL; Glass JM; Fencsik DE; Lauber EJ; Kieras DE; Meyer DE
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11340917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
    Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 21574740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor components in the choice reaction time of mildly retarded adults.
    Brewer N
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 May; 82(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 655203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response-stimulus interval performance of moderately retarded institutionalized subjects.
    Friedrich D; Hawkins WF
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Nov; 80(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 1190267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study investigating the acute dose-response effects of 13 mg and 17 mg Delta 9- tetrahydrocannabinol on cognitive-motor skills, subjective and autonomic measures in regular users of marijuana.
    Weinstein A; Brickner O; Lerman H; Greemland M; Bloch M; Lester H; Chisin R; Sarne Y; Mechoulam R; Bar-Hamburger R; Freedman N; Even-Sapir E
    J Psychopharmacol; 2008 Jun; 22(4):441-51. PubMed ID: 18635724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrete finger response latencies in a simple reaction time task.
    Adam JJ; Van Veggel LM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):863-6. PubMed ID: 1792134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
    Logan GD; Delheimer JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The psychological refractory period of stopping.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):965-81. PubMed ID: 14585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedural learning eliminates specific slowing down of response selection in patients with idiopathic Parkinson syndrome.
    Lachmann T; Schumacher B; Joebges M; Hummelsheim H; van Leeuwen C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Apr; 30(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 17852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.