These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 840619)

  • 1. Component analysis of orientation illusions.
    Wenderoth P; Beh H
    Perception; 1977; 6(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 840619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-dimensional tilt illusions induced by orthogonal plaid patterns: effects of plaid motion, orientation, spatial separation, and spatial frequency.
    Wenderoth P; Johnstone S; van der Zwan R
    Perception; 1989; 18(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 2771592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual factors affecting the rod-and-frame illusion: role of gap size and frame components.
    Antonucci G; Fanzon D; Spinelli D; Zoccolotti P
    Perception; 1995; 24(10):1119-30. PubMed ID: 8577571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions.
    Wenderoth P; Burke D
    Perception; 2006; 35(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 16583766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The angular function of orientation illusions induced by projected images of tilted real object scenes.
    Purcell T; Wenderoth P; Moore D
    Perception; 1978; 7(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 652483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exposure-time and spatial-frequency effects in the tilt illusion.
    O'Toole BI
    Perception; 1979; 8(5):557-64. PubMed ID: 503785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The differential effects of brief exposures and surrounding contours on direct and indirect tilt illusions.
    Wenderoth P; Johnstone S
    Perception; 1988; 17(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 3226861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand.
    Li W; Matin E; Bertz JW; Matin L
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):18.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Respective contribution of orientation contrast and illusion of self-tilt to the rod-and-frame effect.
    Cian C; Esquivié D; Barraud PA; Raphel C
    Perception; 1995; 24(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 7478903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local and global mechanisms of one- and two-dimensional orientation illusions.
    Wenderoth P; van der Zwan R
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 1758764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial and orientation specific integration in the tilt illusion.
    Johnstone S; Wenderoth P
    Perception; 1989; 18(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 2771594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of visual tilt illusions measured by the techniques of verticle setting, parallel matching, and dot alignment.
    Wenderoth P; Parkinson A; White D
    Perception; 1979; 8(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 432080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The tilt illusion: phenomenology and functional implications.
    Clifford CW
    Vision Res; 2014 Nov; 104():3-11. PubMed ID: 24995379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orientation illusions induced by briefly flashed plaids.
    Wenderoth P; van der Zwan R; Johnstone S
    Perception; 1989; 18(6):715-28. PubMed ID: 2628923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reversed tilt effect for dichoptic stimulation in vertical meridian.
    Westheimer G
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 20937299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct evidence for competition between local and global mechanisms of two-dimensional orientation illusions.
    Wenderoth P; van der Zwan R; Williams M
    Perception; 1993; 22(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 8316515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The spacing illusion: a spatial aperture problem?
    Mather G; O'Halloran A; Anstis S
    Perception; 1991; 20(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 1762881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pattern orientation, not motion, determines the two-dimensional tilt illusion.
    Johnstone S; Wenderoth P
    Perception; 1989; 18(6):729-37. PubMed ID: 2628924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-ocular transfer of the tilt illusion shows that monocular orientation mechanisms are colour selective.
    Forte JD; Clifford CW
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2715-21. PubMed ID: 16005490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angle-matching illusions and perceived line orientation.
    Wenderoth P; White D
    Perception; 1979; 8(5):565-75. PubMed ID: 503786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.