These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8407645)

  • 1. Correlations for genetic expression for growth of calves of Hereford and Angus dams using a multivariate animal model.
    Núñez-Dominguez R; Van Vleck LD; Boldman KG; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Sep; 71(9):2330-40. PubMed ID: 8407645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of genetic values of sires for growth traits of crossbred cattle using a multivariate animal model with heterogeneous variances.
    Núñez-Dominguez R; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Oct; 73(10):2940-50. PubMed ID: 8617664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex effects on breed of sire differences for birth, weaning, and yearling weights.
    Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1528-34. PubMed ID: 9655571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breed comparisons for growth traits adjusted for within-breed genetic trend using expected progeny differences.
    Núñez-Dominguez R; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jun; 71(6):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8325800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Germplasm evaluation in beef cattle-cycle IV: birth and weaning traits.
    Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2528-35. PubMed ID: 9814890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossbreeding among British and continental European dual-purpose breeds in the coastal Pacific Northwest.
    Hohenboken WD; Weber DW
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Nov; 67(11):2841-7. PubMed ID: 2592271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Across-breed expected progeny differences: use of within-breed expected progeny differences to adjust breed evaluations for sire sampling and genetic trend.
    Notter DR; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4763-76. PubMed ID: 1808173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Birth and weaning traits in crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Norwegian Red, Swedish Red and White, Wagyu, and Friesian sires.
    Casas E; Thallman RM; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):2916-20. PubMed ID: 22785167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of crossbred calf and cow types for the coastal plain of North Carolina.
    Pala A; Robison OW; McCraw RL
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Sep; 78(9):2253-6. PubMed ID: 10985395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Growth and pubertal development of F1 bulls from Hereford, Angus, Norwegian Red, Swedish Red and White, Friesian, and Wagyu sires.
    Casas E; Lunstra DD; Cundiff LV; Ford JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):2904-9. PubMed ID: 17591712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of crosses among Hereford, Angus and Simmental cattle with different levels of Simmental breeding: V. Calf production, milk production and reproduction of three- to eight-year-old dams.
    Kress DD; Doornbos DE; Anderson DC
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1910-21. PubMed ID: 2384384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of crosses among Hereford, Angus, and Simmental cattle with different levels of Simmental breeding: VI. Maternal heterosis of 3- to 8-year-old dams and the dominance model.
    Kress DD; Doornbos DE; Anderson DC; Rossi D
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Sep; 70(9):2682-7. PubMed ID: 1399882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breed and heterotic effects for mature weight in beef cattle.
    Zimmermann MJ; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML; Thallman RM; Snelling WM; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Aug; 99(8):. PubMed ID: 34261131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Criollo breed Romosinuano as purebred and crossbred cows with Brahman and Angus in Florida. II. Maternal influence on calf traits, cow weight, and measures of maternal efficiency.
    Riley DG; Chase CC; Coleman SW; Olson TA
    J Anim Sci; 2014 May; 92(5):1911-9. PubMed ID: 24671581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of Angus, Charolais, Galloway, Hereford, Longhorn, Nellore, Piedmontese, Salers, and Shorthorn breeds for weight, weight adjusted for condition score, height, and condition score of cows.
    Arango JA; Cundiff LV; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 14753350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birth and weaning traits in crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Brahman, Boran, Tuli, and Belgian Blue sires.
    Casas E; Thallman RM; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Apr; 89(4):979-87. PubMed ID: 21148778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct and maternal breed additive and heterosis effects on growth traits of beef cattle raised in southern Brazil.
    Leal WS; MacNeil MD; Carvalho HG; Vaz RZ; Cardoso FF
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2536-2544. PubMed ID: 29741708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct and maternal genetic effects on birth and weaning traits in multibreed cattle data and predicted performance of breed crosses.
    Franke DE; Habet O; Tawah LC; Williams AR; DeRouen SM
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jul; 79(7):1713-22. PubMed ID: 11465358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of crosses among Hereford, Angus and Simmental cattle with different levels of Simmental breeding: IV. Maternal heterosis and calf production by two-year-old dams.
    Kress DD; Doornbos DE; Anderson DC
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Jan; 68(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 2303401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preweaning efficiency for mature cows of breed crosses from tropically adapted Bos indicus and Bos taurus and unadapted Bos taurus breeds.
    Jenkins TG; Ferrell CL
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jun; 82(6):1876-81. PubMed ID: 15217017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.