These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8408970)

  • 21. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comodulation masking release in a forward-masking paradigm.
    McFadden D; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1615-20. PubMed ID: 3693702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Energetic and informational masking in a simulated restaurant environment.
    Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():511-8. PubMed ID: 23716258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can comodulation masking release occur when frequency changes could promote perceptual segregation of the on-frequency and flanking bands?
    Verhey JL; Epp B; Stasiak A; Winter IM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():475-82. PubMed ID: 23716254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3246. PubMed ID: 33261378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comodulation masking release with random variations of flanking-band center frequencies.
    Doleschal F; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):692. PubMed ID: 32873023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation.
    Eddins DA; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Dec; 96(6):3432-42. PubMed ID: 7814760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech intelligibility in virtual restaurants.
    Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2418. PubMed ID: 27794329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting the development of speech recognition in steady and modulated noise.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2964. PubMed ID: 27250187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1152-64. PubMed ID: 22894234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency discrimination under conditions of comodulation masking release (L).
    Buss E; Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2557-60. PubMed ID: 22501035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning effects in speech-in-noise tasks: Effect of masker modulation and masking release.
    Lie S; Zekveld AA; Smits C; Kramer SE; Versfeld NJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jul; 156(1):341-349. PubMed ID: 38990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Drullman R; Bronkhorst AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comodulation masking release: is comodulation sufficient?
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2896-902. PubMed ID: 8315153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of contralateral noise on speech detection and speech reception thresholds.
    Frank T; Karlovich RS
    Audiology; 1975; 14(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 1147844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.