These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8408970)
21. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comodulation masking release in a forward-masking paradigm. McFadden D; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1615-20. PubMed ID: 3693702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release. Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Energetic and informational masking in a simulated restaurant environment. Culling JF Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():511-8. PubMed ID: 23716258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can comodulation masking release occur when frequency changes could promote perceptual segregation of the on-frequency and flanking bands? Verhey JL; Epp B; Stasiak A; Winter IM Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():475-82. PubMed ID: 23716254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response. van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker. Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3246. PubMed ID: 33261378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comodulation masking release with random variations of flanking-band center frequencies. Doleschal F; Verhey JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):692. PubMed ID: 32873023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation. Eddins DA; Wright BA J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Dec; 96(6):3432-42. PubMed ID: 7814760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking. Biberger T; Ewert SD J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception. Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers. Drullman R; Bronkhorst AW J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]