These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8409861)

  • 1. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'.
    Simon JR; Berbaum K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Mar; 73(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 2343770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: the case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli.
    Kornblum S
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8008775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus congruence and the Simon effect.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 8008782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Urcuioli P
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1146-52. PubMed ID: 14704029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?
    Proctor RW; Vu KP; Nicoletti R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1318-29. PubMed ID: 14710965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward a conceptual clarification.
    Hasbroucq T; Guiard Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):246-66. PubMed ID: 1826315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing and restoring stimulus-response compatibility effects by decreasing the discriminability of location words.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 19041085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Liu X; Park Y; Gu X; Fan J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1710-20. PubMed ID: 20675812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.
    Vivas AB; Fuentes LJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 11495120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.
    Valle-Inclán F; Hackley SA; De Labra C
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 12761624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.