These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8409866)
1. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at suprathreshold levels: an additive neural model. Higashiyama A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):912-23. PubMed ID: 8409866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at threshold: the effects of electrode size. Higashiyama A; Tashiro T Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 2243763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis. Higashiyama A; Hayashi M Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8351181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display. Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes. Lelic D; Mørch CD; Hennings K; Andersen OK; Drewes AM Eur J Pain; 2012 Jul; 16(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 22337577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal and spatial integration for electrocutaneous stimulation. Higashiyama A; Tashiro T Percept Psychophys; 1983 May; 33(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 6877989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes. Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of electric current perception threshold in a sample of normal volunteers]. Galvão Mde L; Manzano GM; Braga Nl; Nóbrega JA Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2005 Jun; 63(2A):289-93. PubMed ID: 16100976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective stimulation of smaller fibers in a compound nerve trunk with single cathode by rectangular current pulses. Tai C; Jiang D IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Mar; 41(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 8045582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial summation in the tactile sensory system: probability summation and neural integration. Gescheider GA; Güçlü B; Sexton JL; Karalunas S; Fontana A Somatosens Mot Res; 2005 Dec; 22(4):255-68. PubMed ID: 16503579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pain sensations associated with electrocutaneous stimulation. Mason JL; Mackay NA IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1976 Sep; 23(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 977006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation. Geng B; Yoshida K; Jensen W J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 21306616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnitude estimates for electrical pulses: evidence for two neural mechanisms. Higashiyama A; Tashiro T Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):537-49. PubMed ID: 2740194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations Shape the Processing of Perceptible as well as Imperceptible Somatosensory Stimuli during Selective Attention. Forschack N; Nierhaus T; Müller MM; Villringer A J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(29):6983-6994. PubMed ID: 28630252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation. Jelinek HF; McIntyre R Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of ELF electromagnetic fields: excitation thresholds and inter-individual variability. Leitgeb N; Schröttner J; Cech R Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 17495660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]