These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8409994)

  • 21. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Effect of ultrasonic shock waves on the bone-bone cement interface].
    Hach J; Benes A; Hani AB; Sosna A; Sunka P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 11759472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of bone lavage on femoral cement penetration and interface temperature during Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement.
    Seeger JB; Jaeger S; Bitsch RG; Mohr G; Röhner E; Clarius M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jan; 95(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 23283372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Clinical results of the use of ultrasonic bone cement extractor in revision arthroplasty in oncology].
    Sokolovsky AV; Sokolovsky VA; Aliev MD
    Vopr Onkol; 2016; 62(6):848-856. PubMed ID: 30695575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Heat generation by ultrasonic bone curette comparing with high-speed drill.
    Suzuki K; Wanibuchi M; Minamida Y; Akiyama Y; Mikami T; Fujishige M; Yamamura A; Nakagawa T; Mikuni N
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Apr; 160(4):721-725. PubMed ID: 29302755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy analysis of emissions from cement when using ultrasonically driven tools.
    Shewale SB; Briggs RD
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):647-50. PubMed ID: 16263610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [An original procedure for cement diaphyseal extraction. The segmental cement extraction system or SEG-CES].
    Cordonnier D; Desrousseaux JF; Polveche G; Rattier B; d'Almeida M; Vinchon B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 8761103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of ultrasonic tools in revision arthroplasty procedures.
    Klapper RC; Caillouette JT
    Contemp Orthop; 1990 Mar; 20(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10148050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Plain radiographs inadequate for evaluation of the cement-bone interface in the hip prosthesis. A cadaver study of femoral stems.
    Jacobs ME; Koeweiden EM; Slooff TJ; Huiskes R; van Horn JR
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Oct; 60(5):541-3. PubMed ID: 2603653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of fume emission from ultrasonic removal of methyl methacrylate cement in revision hip surgery.
    Cautilli GP; Hozack WJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Jun; 9(3):305-6. PubMed ID: 8077979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contamination during removal of cement in revision hip arthroplasty. A cadaver study using ultrasound and high-speed cutters.
    Nogler M; Lass-Flörl C; Wimmer C; Mayr E; Bach C; Ogon M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2003 Apr; 85(3):436-9. PubMed ID: 12729125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Controlled perforation. A safe method of cement removal from the femoral canal.
    Sydney SV; Mallory TH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Apr; (253):168-72. PubMed ID: 2317970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Femoral cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. A biomechanical analysis.
    Dennis DA; Dingman CA; Meglan DA; O'Leary JF; Mallory TH; Berme N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):142-7. PubMed ID: 3594984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Use of ultrasound for the removal of cement in hip prosthesis reoperations].
    Honnart F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 8761104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter (ECSWL) in orthopedics. I. Foundations and overview.
    Park SH; Park JB; Weinstein JN; Loening S
    J Appl Biomater; 1991; 2(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 10149079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.
    Bishop NE; Ferguson S; Tepic S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 May; 78(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 8636165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors influencing pressurization of the femoral canal during cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Maltry JA; Noble PC; Kamaric E; Tullos HS
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Aug; 10(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 8523009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.