These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8410542)
41. Comparative IgG recognition of tick extracts by sera of experimentally infested bovines. Cruz AP; Silva SS; Mattos RT; Da Silva Vaz I; Masuda A; Ferreira CA Vet Parasitol; 2008 Nov; 158(1-2):152-8. PubMed ID: 18849118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: distinct acute phase proteins vary during infestations according to the genetic composition of the bovine hosts, Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Carvalho WA; Bechara GH; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; da Silva JS; de Miranda Santos IK Exp Parasitol; 2008 Apr; 118(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 18171576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Bovine resistance to Amblyomma americanum ticks: an acquired immune response characterized by cutaneous basophil infiltrates. Brown SJ; Barker RW; Askenase PW Vet Parasitol; 1984 Oct; 16(1-2):147-65. PubMed ID: 6543047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Franzin AM; Maruyama SR; Garcia GR; Oliveira RP; Ribeiro JM; Bishop R; Maia AA; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; Santos IK Parasit Vectors; 2017 Jan; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 28143523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of Metarhizium anisopliae (Hyphomycetes) for the control of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) on naturally infested cattle in the Mexican tropics. Alonso-Díaz MA; García L; Galindo-Velasco E; Lezama-Gutierrez R; Angel-Sahagún CA; Rodríguez-Vivas RI; Fragoso-Sánchez H Vet Parasitol; 2007 Jul; 147(3-4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17513054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Relationship between the resistance of cattle to Haemaphysalis longicornis and to Boophilus microplus. Wagland BM; Sutherst RW; Roberts JA Aust Vet J; 1985 Sep; 62(9):308-10. PubMed ID: 4074218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Expression of intracellular calcium signalling genes in cattle skin during tick infestation. Bagnall N; Gough J; Cadogan L; Burns B; Kongsuwan K Parasite Immunol; 2009 Apr; 31(4):177-87. PubMed ID: 19292769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Development, reproductive capacity and survival of Amblyomma variegatum and Boophilus decoloratus in relation to host resistance and climatic factors under field conditions. Solomon G; Kaaya GP Vet Parasitol; 1998 Feb; 75(2-3):241-53. PubMed ID: 9637226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Recent acquisitions on tick and tick-borne disease resistance in N'dama (Bos taurus) and Gobra zebu (Bos indicus) cattle. Mattioli RC; Dempfle L Parassitologia; 1995 Apr; 37(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8532370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Studies on naturally acquired immunity to African ticks. II. Observations on cattle exposed to Rhipicephalus appendiculatus under varying periods of repeated infestations. Dipeolu OO; Mongi AO; Essuman S; Amoo AO; Ndungu JN Vet Parasitol; 1992 Mar; 41(3-4):293-320. PubMed ID: 1502791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cellular response in the tick feeding site in crossbred cattle artificially infested by Rhipicephalus microplus. Engracia Filho JR; Araújo CD; Pinto GN; Mendes YH; Bechara GH Exp Appl Acarol; 2017 Jun; 72(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 28597313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. PCR-based detection of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in their natural host Boophilus microplus and cattle. Oliveira-Sequeira TC; Oliveira MC; Araujo JP; Amarante AF Int J Parasitol; 2005 Jan; 35(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 15619521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Gene expression in the skin of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bagnall NH; Kongsuwan KK; Lew AE; Jonsson NN Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2008 Nov; 126(1-2):110-9. PubMed ID: 18676027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Individual host variations in tick infestations of cattle in a resource-poor community. Dreyer K; Fourie LJ; Kok DJ Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 1998 Dec; 65(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 10192842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Jonsson NN; Piper EK; Constantinoiu CC Parasite Immunol; 2014 Nov; 36(11):553-9. PubMed ID: 25313455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative study of tick burdens in Gudali and Wakwa cattle under natural infestation in the subhumid highlands of Wakwa, Cameroon. Preliminary observations. Tawah CL Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop; 1992; 45(3-4):310-3. PubMed ID: 1339999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection of Babesia bigemina in cattle of different genetic groups and in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus tick. Oliveira MC; Oliveira-Sequeira TC; Regitano LC; Alencar MM; Néo TA; Silva AM; Oliveira HN Vet Parasitol; 2008 Aug; 155(3-4):281-6. PubMed ID: 18565674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]