224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8410609)
1. The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.
Machtei EE; Norderyd J; Koch G; Dunford R; Grossi S; Genco RJ
J Periodontol; 1993 Aug; 64(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 8410609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different diagnostic thresholds on incidence of disease progression.
Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Reasner DS; Howell TH
J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):872-8. PubMed ID: 9736369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
Eickholz P; Kim TS
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of manual and automated probing in an untreated periodontitis population.
Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Koch GG; Sharp TJ; Nevins ML; Davis GH; Howell TH
J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1156-62. PubMed ID: 9444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periodontal disease progression.
Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; Proskin H; Jeffcoat MK
J Periodontol; 2000 Oct; 71(10):1583-90. PubMed ID: 11063391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of direct and indirect clinical attachment level measurements.
Corraini P; Baelum V; Lopez R
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):896-905. PubMed ID: 23869826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Option-4 algorithm for automated disc probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific relative attachment level measurements.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 9182741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of post-surgical flap placement on probing depth and attachment level: a 2-year longitudinal study.
Machtei EE; Ben-Yehouda A
J Periodontol; 1994 Sep; 65(9):855-8. PubMed ID: 7990022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is loss of attachment due to root planning and scaling in sites with minimal probing depths a statistical or real occurrence?
Gunsolley JC; Yeung GM; Butler JH; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 11327062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk indicators for future clinical attachment loss in adult periodontitis. Tooth and site variables.
Grbic JT; Lamster IB
J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 1573540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Progression of probing attachment loss in adult periodontitis.
Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS
J Periodontol; 1991 Mar; 62(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 2027069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
