These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8411324)

  • 1. Long-term prediction of birth weight.
    Santonja-Lucas JJ; Armero C; Martinez-Gonzalez L
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 Aug; 12(8):431-6. PubMed ID: 8411324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Hadlock Method Is Superior to Newer Methods for the Prediction of the Birth Weight Percentile.
    Blue NR; Savabi M; Beddow ME; Katukuri VR; Fritts CM; Izquierdo LA; Chao CR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 30244476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
    McLaren RA; Puckett JL; Chauhan SP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort.
    Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Dias T; Cooper D; Thilaganathan B;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 44(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 24311473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of common ultrasound methods of fetal weight estimation in late pregnancy among women in Kwale, Niger Delta region, Nigeria.
    Eze CU; Egwuanumku KI; Agwuna KK; Odidi L; Ochie K; Nwadike IU
    Afr Health Sci; 2015 Mar; 15(1):206-16. PubMed ID: 25834550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Menstrual age-dependent systematic error in sonographic fetal weight estimation: a mathematical model.
    Mongelli M; Biswas A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 11948569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of birth weight using the Rossavik growth model: a study in a Dutch population.
    Kurniawan YS; Deter RL; Visser GH; Torringa JL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1997 Jun; 25(5):235-42. PubMed ID: 9314104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Hod M; Bar J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Feb; 130(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 16720074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight.
    Hedriana HL; Moore TR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1600-4; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 8203416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasonographic evaluation of fetal weight in normal, single fetus pregnancies in the population of Wrocław].
    Florjański J; Zalewski J; Bielanów T; Gabryś M
    Ginekol Pol; 1993 Mar; 64(3):120-2. PubMed ID: 8359737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Fetal Weight Estimation Formulas in Assessing Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
    Barel O; Maymon R; Elovits M; Smorgick N; Tovbin J; Vaknin Z
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Jun; 37(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 25075910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonic prediction of term birth weight in Hispanic women. Accuracy in an outpatient clinic.
    Nahum GG; Pham KQ; McHugh JP
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 12611089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
    Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.