These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8412712)

  • 21. Extracting the orientation of rotating objects without object identification: Object orientation induction.
    Shioiri S; Hashimoto K; Matsumiya K; Kuriki I; He S
    J Vis; 2018 Sep; 18(9):17. PubMed ID: 30242388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of novel tasks for studying view-invariant object recognition in rodents: Sensitivity to scopolamine.
    Mitchnick KA; Wideman CE; Huff AE; Palmer D; McNaughton BL; Winters BD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 May; 344():48-56. PubMed ID: 29412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rotation direction affects object recognition.
    Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1717-30. PubMed ID: 15136006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of plane rotation on the recognition of brief masked pictures of familiar objects.
    Lawson R; Jolicoeur P
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):791-803. PubMed ID: 9701970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.
    Harris IM; Dux PE
    Cognition; 2005 Feb; 95(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 15629474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binding identity and orientation in object recognition.
    Harris IM; Harris JA; Corballis MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):153-167. PubMed ID: 30771110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Object identification as a function of discriminability and learning presentations: the effect of stimulus similarity and canonical frame alignment on aircraft identification.
    Ashworth AR; Dror IE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 10937318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes.
    Nielsen KJ; Logothetis NK; Rainer G
    J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 18318635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structural similarity and spatiotemporal noise effects on learning dynamic novel objects.
    Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
    Perception; 2006; 35(4):497-510. PubMed ID: 16700292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI.
    Cohen MS; Kosslyn SM; Breiter HC; DiGirolamo GJ; Thompson WL; Anderson AK; Brookheimer SY; Rosen BR; Belliveau JW
    Brain; 1996 Feb; 119 ( Pt 1)():89-100. PubMed ID: 8624697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repetition blindness for rotated objects.
    Hayward WG; Zhou G; Man WF; Harris IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 20121295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
    Lawson R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning separate visual representations of independently rotating objects.
    Tromans JM; Page HJ; Stringer SM
    Network; 2012; 23(1-2):1-23. PubMed ID: 22364581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials.
    Leek EC; Atherton CJ; Thierry G
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 17267003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reference frames for orientation anisotropies in face recognition and biological-motion perception.
    Troje NF
    Perception; 2003; 32(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 12696665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mental rotation: an examination of assumptions.
    Searle JA; Hamm JP
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 28387440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.
    Wasserman EA; Gagliardi JL; Cook BR; Kirkpatrick-Steger K; Astley SL; Biederman I
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Apr; 22(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 8618103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of distance between objects and distance from the vertical axis on shape identity judgments.
    Friedman A; Pilon DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):552-64. PubMed ID: 7968551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Induced gamma band responses predict recognition delays during object identification.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):921-34. PubMed ID: 17536963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.