These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8412914)

  • 1. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 100 cases.
    Jones RA
    Med J Aust; 1993 Oct; 159(7):447-9. PubMed ID: 8412914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.
    Ottosen C; Lingman G; Ottosen L
    BJOG; 2000 Nov; 107(11):1380-5. PubMed ID: 11117766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies in private practice and visiting professorship programs.
    Phillips DR; Nathanson HG; Milim SJ; Haselkorn JS
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 Nov; 3(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9050616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.
    Garry R; Fountain J; Mason S; Hawe J; Napp V; Abbott J; Clayton R; Phillips G; Whittaker M; Lilford R; Bridgman S; Brown J
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7432):129. PubMed ID: 14711749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.
    Garry R; Fountain J; Brown J; Manca A; Mason S; Sculpher M; Napp V; Bridgman S; Gray J; Lilford R
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(26):1-154. PubMed ID: 15215018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial experience with supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy and removal of the cervical transformation zone.
    Ewen SP; Sutton CJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8193097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic total abdominal hysterectomy by suturing technique, with no transvaginal surgical approach: a review of 276 cases.
    Ostrzenski A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Dec; 55(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 9003950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy--a preliminary study.
    Oscarsson U; Poromaa IS; Nüssler E; Löfgren M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 16752259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Olsson JH; Ellstrom M; Hahlin M
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Apr; 103(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 8605132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery.
    Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Effect of Laparoscopic and Abdominal Hysterectomy on Lower Urinary Tract Function, Vaginal Length, and Dyspareunia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Polat M; Kahramanoglu I; Senol T; Senturk B; Ozkaya E; Karateke A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Feb; 26(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 26671303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
    Raju KS; Auld BJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Dec; 101(12):1068-71. PubMed ID: 7826960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7800317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.