These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8412921)

  • 1. Data collection and changing health care systems. 1. United Kingdom.
    Miller G; Britt H
    Med J Aust; 1993 Oct; 159(7):471-6. PubMed ID: 8412921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data collection and changing health care systems. 2. New Zealand.
    Britt H; Miller G
    Med J Aust; 1993 Oct; 159(7):476-9. PubMed ID: 8412922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What are the Read Codes?
    Booth N
    Health Libr Rev; 1994 Sep; 11(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 10139676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The application of Read Codes to anaesthesia.
    Banks IC
    Anaesthesia; 1994 Apr; 49(4):324-7. PubMed ID: 8179142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in the recording of diabetes diagnostic data in primary care computer systems: implications for the quality of care.
    Rollason W; Khunti K; de Lusignan S
    Inform Prim Care; 2009; 17(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 19807953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The history of the Read Codes: the inaugural James Read Memorial Lecture 2011.
    Benson T
    Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 22688227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity. CPRI Work Group on Codes and Structures.
    Campbell JR; Carpenter P; Sneiderman C; Cohn S; Chute CG; Warren J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1997; 4(3):238-51. PubMed ID: 9147343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
    Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Read clinical classification and its use in plastic surgery.
    James NK
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 May; 76(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 8017810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the quality of patient data collected by hospital and departmental computer systems.
    Walshe K; Harrison N; Renshaw M
    Health Trends; 1993; 25(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 10131863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A language of health in action: Read Codes, classifications and groupings.
    Stuart-Buttle CD; Read JD; Sanderson HF; Sutton YM
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():75-9. PubMed ID: 8947631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UK and Croatia: family practice, its medical records and computerisation in the context of an enlarged Europe.
    de Lusignan S; Katić M
    Inform Prim Care; 2007; 15(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 18005565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of Read codes in development of a standard data set.
    Smith N; Wilson A; Weekes T
    BMJ; 1995 Jul; 311(7000):313-5. PubMed ID: 7633247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers.
    Gray J; Orr D; Majeed A
    BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7399):1130. PubMed ID: 12763987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomised crossover trial comparing the performance of Clinical Terms Version 3 and Read Codes 5 byte set coding schemes in general practice.
    Brown PJ; Warmington V; Laurence M; Prevost AT
    BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7399):1127. PubMed ID: 12763986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing a standard dataset for the NHS. Read codes' primary use is clinical.
    Bradley P
    BMJ; 1995 Oct; 311(7010):951. PubMed ID: 7580579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A methodology for the functional comparison of coding schemes in primary care.
    Brown PJ; Warmington V; Laurence M; Prevost AT
    Inform Prim Care; 2003; 11(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 14680537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Representation of clinical problem assessment phrases in U.S. family practice using Read version 3.1 terms: a preliminary study.
    Hausam RR; Hahn AW
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():426-30. PubMed ID: 8563317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical Record Abstracting System/Information Delivery System (MRAS/IDS).
    Chisholm K; Fung M; Lo A
    Health Inf Manag; 1994 Dec; 24(4):153-5. PubMed ID: 10142477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model for the evaluation of computerised codes. The Gabrieli Medical Nomenclature as an example.
    Bolton P; Mira M; Usher H; Prior G
    Aust Fam Physician; 1997 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S76-8. PubMed ID: 9254946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.