These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8413009)

  • 1. Effects of x-ray tube-voltage ripple and current mode on patient dose.
    Kubota H; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8413009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of voltage ripple and current mode on diagnostic x-ray spectra and exposures.
    Matsumoto M; Kubota H; Hayashi H; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(5):921-7. PubMed ID: 1961155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Evangelou EK; Nomicos CD
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1965-75. PubMed ID: 8994161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of the effective size of the input phosphor of an x-ray image intensifier.
    Feldman A; Cox R; Rosser J
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1641-2. PubMed ID: 9350719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Speed S sensitivity of film-screen systems and mode of action of different automatic illumination in general practice. I: Film-screen systems].
    Blendl C; Kondmann M; Müller J
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9410006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical applications of basic x-ray physics principles.
    Schueler BA
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):731-44; quiz 729. PubMed ID: 9599394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image information transfer properties of x-ray intensifying screens in the energy range from 17 to 320 keV.
    Ginzburg A; Dick CE
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1013-21. PubMed ID: 8413008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physics overview of screen-film radiography.
    Ritenour ER
    Radiographics; 1996 Jul; 16(4):903-16. PubMed ID: 8835979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The physics of computed radiography: measurements of pulse height spectra of photostimulable phosphor screens using prompt luminescence.
    Watt KN; Yan K; DeCrescenzo G; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3589-98. PubMed ID: 16475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye dose limits and the use of overcouch and undercouch X-ray image intensifier systems.
    Palmer KE; Wright IH
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Dec; 58(696):1221-3. PubMed ID: 3842637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel technique to suppress grid line artifacts.
    Gauntt DM; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1654-67. PubMed ID: 16872073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
    Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
    Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical x-ray films.
    Dickerson RE; Haus AG; Baker CW
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8058018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dependency of dose response of five charge-coupled device-based digital intra-oral radiographic systems on tube voltage.
    Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Nov; 28(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 10578191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.