These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8414887)
1. Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception. Friederici AD; Wessels JM Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 8414887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies. Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size. Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Listeners learn phonotactic patterns conditioned on suprasegmental cues. White KS; Chambers KE; Miller Z; Jethava V Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2560-2576. PubMed ID: 27734753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Mattys SL; Jusczyk PW; Luce PA; Morgan JL Cogn Psychol; 1999 Jun; 38(4):465-94. PubMed ID: 10334878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants. Mattys SL; Jusczyk PW Cognition; 2001 Feb; 78(2):91-121. PubMed ID: 11074247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infants' statistical word segmentation in an artificial language is linked to both parental speech input and reported production abilities. Hoareau M; Yeung HH; Nazzi T Dev Sci; 2019 Jul; 22(4):e12803. PubMed ID: 30681753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implicit processing of phonotactic cues: evidence from electrophysiological and vascular responses. Rossi S; Jürgenson IB; Hanulíková A; Telkemeyer S; Wartenburger I; Obrig H J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1752-64. PubMed ID: 20666594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics. Johnson EK; Seidl AH Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 19120421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nine-month-olds use frequency of onset clusters to segment novel words. Archer SL; Curtin S J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Aug; 148():131-41. PubMed ID: 27181298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A "bat" is easier to learn than a "tab": effects of relative phonotactic frequency on infant word learning. Gonzalez-Gomez N; Poltrock S; Nazzi T PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59601. PubMed ID: 23527227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation. Blanchard D; Heinz J; Golinkoff R J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):487-511. PubMed ID: 20307346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Jusczyk PW; Cutler A; Redanz NJ Child Dev; 1993 Jun; 64(3):675-87. PubMed ID: 8339688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Infants' sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech. Myers J; Jusczyk PW; Kemler Nelson DG; Charles-Luce J; Woodward AL; Hirsh-Pasek K J Child Lang; 1996 Feb; 23(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 8733559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infants' Processing of Prosodic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Boundary Perception beyond Pause Detection. Holzgrefe-Lang J; Wellmann C; Höhle B; Wartenburger I Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):153-169. PubMed ID: 28937300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phonotactic regularities in the segmentation of spoken Italian. Tagliapietra L; Fanari R; De Candia C; Tabossi P Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):392-415. PubMed ID: 18609378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Brent MR; Cartwright TA Cognition; 1996; 61(1-2):93-125. PubMed ID: 8990969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]