381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8415169)
1. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Guven Y
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8634193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluoride exchange from glass ionomer preventive resin restorations.
Kupietzky A; Houpt M; Mellberg J; Shey Z
Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7831138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
Hung TW; Richardson AS
J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
Olsen BT; Garcia-Godoy F; Marshall TD; Barnwell GM
Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 2513842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
Svanberg M
Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
Garcia-Godoy F; Chan DC
Am J Dent; 1991 Oct; 4(5):223-5. PubMed ID: 1810331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
Croll TP
Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in xerostomic head- and neck-irradiated cancer patients.
De Moor RJ; Stassen IG; van 't Veldt Y; Torbeyns D; Hommez GM
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Feb; 15(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19997859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro caries-inhibitory properties of a silver cermet.
Swift EJ
J Dent Res; 1989 Jun; 68(6):1088-93. PubMed ID: 2509525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations.
Svanberg M; Krasse B; Ornerfeldt HO
Caries Res; 1990; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
