These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8415169)

  • 1. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
    Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
    Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Guven Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8634193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluoride exchange from glass ionomer preventive resin restorations.
    Kupietzky A; Houpt M; Mellberg J; Shey Z
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7831138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Olsen BT; Garcia-Godoy F; Marshall TD; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 2513842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Chan DC
    Am J Dent; 1991 Oct; 4(5):223-5. PubMed ID: 1810331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in xerostomic head- and neck-irradiated cancer patients.
    De Moor RJ; Stassen IG; van 't Veldt Y; Torbeyns D; Hommez GM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Feb; 15(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19997859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro caries-inhibitory properties of a silver cermet.
    Swift EJ
    J Dent Res; 1989 Jun; 68(6):1088-93. PubMed ID: 2509525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M; Krasse B; Ornerfeldt HO
    Caries Res; 1990; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.