These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Mental imagery and sensory experience in congenital blindness. Arditi A; Holtzman JD; Kosslyn SM Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 3362335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right. Juricevic I; Kennedy JM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Depth effect from a rotating line of constant length. Zanforlin M; Vallortigara G Percept Psychophys; 1988 Nov; 44(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 3226900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental imagery acuity in the peripheral visual field. Finke RA; Kosslyn SM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Feb; 6(1):126-39. PubMed ID: 6444986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The vista paradox: a natural visual illusion. Walker JT; Rupich RC; Powell JL Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jan; 45(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2913569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outlined objects in a Mach pattern create illusions: further evidence of a frequency code for size. Jaeger T; Long S; Lang J Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):165-80. PubMed ID: 18986044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceived relative distance depends on the size ratio of targets in photographs. Takezawa T Perception; 2013; 42(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 23837205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mental imagery and the third dimension. Pinker S J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):354-71. PubMed ID: 6447193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The box alignment illusion: an orientation illusion induced by pictorial depth. Enns JT; Coren S Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1163-74. PubMed ID: 8539091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance. Levin CA; Haber RN Percept Psychophys; 1993 Aug; 54(2):250-9. PubMed ID: 8361840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Size scaling: retinal or environmental frame of reference? Bennett DJ; Warren W Percept Psychophys; 2002 Apr; 64(3):462-77. PubMed ID: 12049286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface construal and the mental representation of scenes. Gottesman CV; Intraub H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):589-99. PubMed ID: 12075890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geometric and perceptual effects of the location of the observer vantage point for linear-perspective images. Todorović D Perception; 2005; 34(5):521-44. PubMed ID: 15991690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parts of visual objects: an experimental test of the minima rule. Braunstein ML; Hoffman DD; Saidpour A Perception; 1989; 18(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 2628932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects. Kaneko H; Uchikawa K Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Moon illusion in pictures: a multimechanism approach. Coren S; Aks DJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 May; 16(2):365-80. PubMed ID: 2142205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]