These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8417549)
21. Defibrillation electrode configurations developed from cardiac mapping that combine biphasic shocks with sequential timing. Guse PA; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Am Heart J; 1992 Dec; 124(6):1491-500. PubMed ID: 1462904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks. Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads. Saksena S; An H; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Burkhardt E; Mehta D; John T Am J Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 70(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 1632393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transthoracic impedance does not decrease with rapidly repeated countershocks in a swine cardiac arrest model. Niemann JT; Garner D; Lewis RJ Resuscitation; 2003 Jan; 56(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 12505744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt. Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1753-9. PubMed ID: 10642128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimized pulse durations minimize the effect of polarity reversal on defibrillation efficacy with biphasic shocks. Schauerte P; Schöndube FA; Grossmann M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 May; 22(5):790-7. PubMed ID: 10353140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biphasic versus sequential pulse defibrillation: a direct comparison in humans. Jones DL; Klein GJ; Guiraudon GM; Yee R Am Heart J; 1993 Feb; 125(2 Pt 1):405-9. PubMed ID: 8427134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sequential pulse defibrillation in humans: orthogonal sequential pulse defibrillation with epicardial electrodes. Jones DL; Klein GJ; Guiraudon GM; Sharma AD J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 11(3):590-6. PubMed ID: 3343463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Marked reduction in internal atrial defibrillation thresholds with dual-current pathways and sequential shocks in humans. Cooper RA; Plumb VJ; Epstein AE; Kay GN; Ideker RE Circulation; 1998 Jun; 97(25):2527-35. PubMed ID: 9657473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective comparison of sequential pulse and single pulse defibrillation with use of two different clinically available systems. Bardy GH; Ivey TD; Allen MD; Johnson G; Greene HL J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jul; 14(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 2738261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential shocks for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs. Chapman PD; Vetter JW; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN; Hoffmann RG J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 12(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 3403834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: marked reduction in defibrillation threshold with dual current pathways. Cooper RA; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1997 Oct; 96(8):2693-700. PubMed ID: 9355911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Potential benefit of transesophageal defibrillation: an experimental evaluation. Mischke K; Schimpf T; Knackstedt C; Zarse M; Eickholt C; Plisiene J; Frechen D; Gramley F; Schauerte P Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Jul; 24(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 16787798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of a Unique Defibrillation Unit with Dual-Vector Biphasic Waveform Capabilities: Towards a Miniaturized Defibrillator. Okamura H; Desimone CV; Killu AM; Gilles EJ; Tri J; Asirvatham R; Ladewig DJ; Suddendorf SH; Powers JM; Wood-Wentz CM; Gray PD; Raymond DM; Savage SJ; Savage WT; Bruce CJ; Asirvatham SJ; Friedman PA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Feb; 40(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 27990645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ventricular defibrillation with myocardial electrodes in the dog, calf, pony, and pig. Gold JH; Schuder JC; Stoeckle H Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7354731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defibrillation efficacy using high-frequency switching to proportion current among simultaneous shock pathways. Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Mar; 8(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 9083877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveform. Fain ES; Sweeney MB; Franz MR Am Heart J; 1989 Feb; 117(2):358-64. PubMed ID: 2916410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation. Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy and safety of monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks using a braided endocardial defibrillation lead system. Saksena S; Scott SE; Accorti PR; Boveja BK; Abels D; Callaghan FJ Am Heart J; 1990 Dec; 120(6 Pt 1):1342-7. PubMed ID: 2248181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]