These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. King DE; Lahiri K JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 8046806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis. Grant D; McInnes MM Inquiry; 2004; 41(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 15449432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defensive medicine and obstetrics. Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Lloyd M; Fordyce M; Rosenblatt RA JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1606-10. PubMed ID: 7474245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois. Rock SM Public Health Rep; 1988; 103(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 3140270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States. Little SE; Orav EJ; Robinson JN; Caughey AB; Jha AK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):735.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26721777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital-Level Factors Associated with Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Cesarean Deliveries, New York State, 2009-2011. Guglielminotti J; Deneux-Tharaux C; Wong CA; Li G Anesth Analg; 2016 Jun; 122(6):1947-56. PubMed ID: 27195637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical Malpractice Liability Exposure and OB/GYN Physician Delivery Decisions. Durrance CP; Hankins S Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 53(4):2633-2650. PubMed ID: 29226309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects. Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA Med Care; 1992 Jun; 30(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 1593918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals. Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates. Dubay L; Kaestner R; Waidmann T J Health Econ; 1999 Aug; 18(4):491-522. PubMed ID: 10539619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates. Bailit JL; Dooley SL; Peaceman AN Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 10362175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. II. Is targeting effective? Rolph JE; Kravitz RL; McGuigan K JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2093-7. PubMed ID: 1920697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between physicians' malpractice claims history and later claims. Does the past predict the future? Bovbjerg RR; Petronis KR JAMA; 1994 Nov; 272(18):1421-6. PubMed ID: 7933423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure. Vimercati A; Greco P; Kardashi A; Rossi C; Loizzi V; Scioscia M; Loverro G J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10875095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status. Burstin HR; Johnson WG; Lipsitz SR; Brennan TA JAMA; 1993 Oct; 270(14):1697-701. PubMed ID: 8411499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice. Zwecker P; Azoulay L; Abenhaim HA Am J Perinatol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 21249618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns. Gimm GW Health Serv Res; 2010 Feb; 45(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 19929964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data. DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties. Kravitz RL; Rolph JE; McGuigan K JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2087-92. PubMed ID: 1920696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]