These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8418343)

  • 1. Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.
    Localio AR; Lawthers AG; Bengtson JM; Hebert LE; Weaver SL; Brennan TA; Landis JR
    JAMA; 1993 Jan; 269(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 8418343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    King DE; Lahiri K
    JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 8046806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis.
    Grant D; McInnes MM
    Inquiry; 2004; 41(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 15449432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defensive medicine and obstetrics.
    Baldwin LM; Hart LG; Lloyd M; Fordyce M; Rosenblatt RA
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1606-10. PubMed ID: 7474245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.
    Rock SM
    Public Health Rep; 1988; 103(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 3140270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.
    Little SE; Orav EJ; Robinson JN; Caughey AB; Jha AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):735.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26721777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hospital-Level Factors Associated with Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Cesarean Deliveries, New York State, 2009-2011.
    Guglielminotti J; Deneux-Tharaux C; Wong CA; Li G
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jun; 122(6):1947-56. PubMed ID: 27195637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical Malpractice Liability Exposure and OB/GYN Physician Delivery Decisions.
    Durrance CP; Hankins S
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 53(4):2633-2650. PubMed ID: 29226309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects.
    Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA
    Med Care; 1992 Jun; 30(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 1593918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
    Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates.
    Dubay L; Kaestner R; Waidmann T
    J Health Econ; 1999 Aug; 18(4):491-522. PubMed ID: 10539619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.
    Bailit JL; Dooley SL; Peaceman AN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 10362175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. II. Is targeting effective?
    Rolph JE; Kravitz RL; McGuigan K
    JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2093-7. PubMed ID: 1920697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between physicians' malpractice claims history and later claims. Does the past predict the future?
    Bovbjerg RR; Petronis KR
    JAMA; 1994 Nov; 272(18):1421-6. PubMed ID: 7933423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure.
    Vimercati A; Greco P; Kardashi A; Rossi C; Loizzi V; Scioscia M; Loverro G
    J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10875095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status.
    Burstin HR; Johnson WG; Lipsitz SR; Brennan TA
    JAMA; 1993 Oct; 270(14):1697-701. PubMed ID: 8411499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.
    Zwecker P; Azoulay L; Abenhaim HA
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 21249618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns.
    Gimm GW
    Health Serv Res; 2010 Feb; 45(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 19929964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties.
    Kravitz RL; Rolph JE; McGuigan K
    JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2087-92. PubMed ID: 1920696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.