These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Ethical and legal issues in research and intervention. Melton GB J Adolesc Health Care; 1989 May; 10(3 Suppl):36S-44S. PubMed ID: 2656606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. France halts study on artificial insemination. Dorozynski A BMJ; 1993 Oct; 307(6911):1026. PubMed ID: 11643186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial insemination and semen cryobanking: health and safety concerns and the role of professional standards, law and public policy. Frankel MS Leg Med Q; 1979; 3(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 10245513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights. Katerberg RJ J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Teenagers and questionnaire research. Holder AR IRB; 1983; 5(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 11649517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. France urged to change ethics rule. Butler D Nature; 1993 Oct; 365(6447):597. PubMed ID: 8413619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. University says research subjects' family members are not research subjects too. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Feb; 20(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15839006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Family dynamics and children in medical research. Gordon VM; Bonkovsky FO J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(4):349-54; discussion 362-4. PubMed ID: 9029336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. FDA approved? A critique of the artificial insemination industry in the United States. Ginsberg KM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1997; 30(4):823-51. PubMed ID: 16514779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bill requires express written consent, not "passive consent. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):6. PubMed ID: 11654275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential research subject complains about the violation of her privacy. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Oct; 17(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 12731497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Law would remove ability of institutional review boards to waive written consent. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Parental consent and family planning research involving minors: case study. Herceg-Baron R IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Artificial insemination: a Strasbourg contribution? The legal viewpoint]. Hausheer H Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1980 Aug; 100(8):711-9. PubMed ID: 7466109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Student rights in research and experimental programs. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2004 Oct; 19(10):3. PubMed ID: 15675084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Subjects must have access to treatment and research records. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]