These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8421725)

  • 1. Storage phosphor radiography of the chest.
    Schaefer CM; Prokop M
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):314-5. PubMed ID: 8421725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The use of reinforcement screens of rare earth in the Chest x-ray].
    Bergonzini R
    Radiol Med; 1982; 68(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 7100533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chest radiography.
    Ravin CE; Chotas HG
    Radiology; 1997 Sep; 204(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 9280231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 8421741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Low-dose digital roentgenography of the thoracic cavity: comparative evaluation of the method].
    Kitaev VM; Belova IB
    Voen Med Zh; 2003 Mar; 324(3):47-54. PubMed ID: 12722513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging.
    Schaefer CM; Greene RE; Oestmann JW; Kamalsky JM; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; Robertson CL; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):713-6. PubMed ID: 2813775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new phosphor plate technology for neonatal portable chest radiographs.
    Cohen M; Corea D; Wanner M; Karmazyn B; Gunderman R; Applegate K; Jennings SG
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 21232684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.