179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8421731)
41. [CT angiography in carotid stenosis. Diagnostic value compared to color-coded duplex ultrasonography and MR angiography].
Steger W; Vogl TJ; Rausch M; Pegios W; Schedel H; Heinzinger K
Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 7772758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cerebrovascular magnetic resonance angiography: a critical verification.
Wesbey GE; Bergan JJ; Moreland SI; Sedwitz MM; Bardin JA; Schmalbrock P; Listerud J
J Vasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 16(4):619-28; discussion 628-32. PubMed ID: 1404682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
Leclerc X; Godefroy O; Pruvo JP; Leys D
Stroke; 1995 Sep; 26(9):1577-81. PubMed ID: 7660401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Work in progress.
Schwartz RB; Jones KM; Chernoff DM; Mukherji SK; Khorasani R; Tice HM; Kikinis R; Hooton SM; Stieg PE; Polak JF
Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):513-9. PubMed ID: 1410365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Surgical decisions on the basis of magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries.
Anson JA; Heiserman JE; Drayer BP; Spetzler RF
Neurosurgery; 1993 Mar; 32(3):335-43; discussion 343. PubMed ID: 8455757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Conventional T2-Weighted Imaging to Detect High-Grade Stenosis and Occlusion of Internal Carotid Artery, Vertebral Artery, and Basilar Artery.
Li Q; Tian CL; Yang YW; Lou X; Yu SY
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jul; 24(7):1591-6. PubMed ID: 25900410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Accuracy of color duplex ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous carotid dissection causing ischemia.
Benninger DH; Georgiadis D; Gandjour J; Baumgartner RW
Stroke; 2006 Feb; 37(2):377-81. PubMed ID: 16373650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Carotid arteries: evaluation with low-field-strength MR angiography.
Pavone P; Marsili L; Catalano C; Petroni GA; Aytan E; Cardone GP; Passariello R
Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 1620836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR angiography: comparison with x-ray angiography and color-coded Doppler ultrasound.
Anderson CM; Saloner D; Lee RE; Griswold VJ; Shapeero LG; Rapp JH; Nagarkar S; Pan X; Gooding GA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1992; 13(3):989-1003; discussion 1005-8. PubMed ID: 1590203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Carotid duplex scan versus angiography in evaluation of carotid artery disease.
Fontenelle LJ; Simper SC; Hanson TL
Am Surg; 1994 Nov; 60(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 7978683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Power Doppler imaging: initial evaluation as a screening examination for carotid artery stenosis.
Bluth EI; Sunshine JH; Lyons JB; Beam CA; Troxclair LA; Althans-Kopecky L; Crewson PE; Sullivan MA; Smetherman DH; Heidenreich PA; Neiman HL; Burkhardt JH
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):791-800. PubMed ID: 10831701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance angiography is accurate in predicting degree of carotid stenosis.
Morasch MD; Gurjala AN; Washington E; Chiou AC; Simonetti OP; Finn JP; Yao JS
Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 11957000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. High signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on maximum intensity projection images of time-of-flight MR angiography: a new sign for intraplaque hemorrhage.
Yim YJ; Choe YH; Ko Y; Kim ST; Kim KH; Jeon P; Byun HS; Kim DI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1341-6. PubMed ID: 18504753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The comparative evaluation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance for carotid artery disease.
Wilkerson DK; Keller I; Mezrich R; Schroder WB; Sebok D; Gronlund-Jacobs J; Conway R; Zatina MA
J Vasc Surg; 1991 Dec; 14(6):803-9; discussion 809-11. PubMed ID: 1960811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Imaging of the internal carotid artery: the dilemma of total versus near total occlusion.
El-Saden SM; Grant EG; Hathout GM; Zimmerman PT; Cohen SN; Baker JD
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 11687668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy.
Huston J; Nichols DA; Luetmer PH; Rydberg CH; Lewis BD; Meyer FB; Brown RD; Schleck CD
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Feb; 19(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 9504484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Carotid plaque formation and its evaluation with angiography, ultrasound, and MR angiography.
Wasserman BA; Haacke EM; Li D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(4):515-27. PubMed ID: 7949676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessing extracranial carotid stenosis: magnetic resonance angiography, duplex scanning, and digital angiography.
Freeman J; Free T; Payne H; Gutnik L; Schultz G; Masterson T; Brewer M
S D J Med; 1993 Feb; 46(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 8441927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. CT angiography of the common carotid artery bifurcation: comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography.
Castillo M; Wilson JD
Neuroradiology; 1994 Nov; 36(8):602-4. PubMed ID: 7862273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
