91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8421742)
1. Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation.
Goodman LR; Wilson CR; Kim CS
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 8421742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scanning equalization radiography of the chest: assessment of image quality.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DP; Vogelstein E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 2931967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exposure equalization radiography of the chest: clinical comparison of slit and raster scanning techniques.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jun; 144(6):1171-81. PubMed ID: 3873796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The determination of the surface and organ doses in the AMBER system. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
Herzog R; von Boetticher H; Luska G
Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 8490159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.
Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
Itouji E; Kono M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of exposure variation on the clinical utility of chest radiographs.
Slone RM; Van Metter R; Senol E; Muka E; Pilgram TK
Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 8668802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variable compensation technique for digital radiography of the chest.
Dobbins JT; Powell AO
Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 2798877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT of the chest: minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose.
Mayo JR; Hartman TE; Lee KS; Primack SL; Vedal S; Müller NL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 7863879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a new dual characteristic film-screen system (insight) with a standard film-screen system for chest radiology.
Logan PM; Tunney T; McCoy CT; Masterson J
Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):162-5. PubMed ID: 8130978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Radiography of the thorax with phospholuminescent screens].
Frija J; Zagdanski AM; De Kerviler E; Attal P; Laval-Jeantet M
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1994; 37(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 8092748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax: comparison with the standard-dose technique.
Takahashi M; Maguire WM; Ashtari M; Khan A; Papp Z; Alberico R; Campbell W; Eacobacci T; Herman PG
Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 9493720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9587768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
