140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8422030)
1. The effect of fixed and functional appliances on enamel decalcifications in early Class II treatment.
Alexander SA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jan; 103(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 8422030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques.
McSherry PF; Bradley H
J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 11099554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. Part 3. Functional appliance therapy'.
Bass NM
Br Dent J; 1990 May; 168(10):385-6. PubMed ID: 2346690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
Johnson BE
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Trenouth MJ
Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 1452055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1.
Bolmgren GA; Moshiri F
Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 3461735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevention of enamel demineralization: an in-vitro study using light-cured filled sealant.
Hu W; Featherstone JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):592-600; quiz 670. PubMed ID: 16286206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A cephalometric comparison of orthopedic (Activator) headgear and orthodontic (Edgewise) treatments in Class II, 1 malocclusions].
Altuğ Z
Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 May; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3271149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Occurrence and severity of enamel decalcification adjacent to bracket bases and sub-bracket lesions during orthodontic treatment with two different lingual appliances.
Knösel M; Klang E; Helms HJ; Wiechmann D
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 26420772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in cyclic mandibular movements during treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable functional appliances.
Thieme KM; Nägerl H; Hahn W; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 21262934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial.
Tulloch JF; Phillips C; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):62-72, quiz 73-4. PubMed ID: 9457020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
