These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8422161)

  • 1. Inadequacies of hospital medical records.
    Patel AG; Mould T; Webb PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Jan; 75(1 Suppl):7-9. PubMed ID: 8422161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard.
    Shayah A; Agada FO; Gunasekaran S; Jassar P; England RJ
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 61(4):677-9. PubMed ID: 17394439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An audit of the quality of operation notes in two district general hospitals. Are we following Royal College guidelines?
    Baigrie RJ; Dowling BL; Birch D; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1994 Jan; 76(1 Suppl):8-10. PubMed ID: 8017801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An audit of medical record-keeping in maxillofacial surgery at the University College Hospital, Ibadan using the CRABEL Scoring system.
    Arotiba JT; Akinmoladun VI; Okoje VN
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2006 Mar; 35(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 17209334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve.
    Lefter LP; Walker SR; Dewhurst F; Turner RW
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):800-2. PubMed ID: 18844913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.
    Chamisa I; Zulu BM
    S Afr J Surg; 2007 Aug; 45(3):92, 94-5. PubMed ID: 17892187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
    Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of clinical case note entries: how good are we at achieving set standards?
    Osborn GD; Pike H; Smith M; Winter R; Vaughan-Williams E
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 16263018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.
    Grewal P
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 23618448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The operative note as billing documentation: a preliminary report.
    Flynn MB; Allen DA
    Am Surg; 2004 Jul; 70(7):570-4; discussion 574-5. PubMed ID: 15279177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer generated operation notes.
    Currall VA; Chesser TJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():51-5. PubMed ID: 18560067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of clinical notes for vascular surgery admissions: a CRABEL score review.
    Suh J; Roake JA; Lewis DR
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Jul; 79(7-8):539-43. PubMed ID: 19694664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The CRABEL score--a method for auditing medical records.
    Crawford JR; Beresford TP; Lafferty KL
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jan; 83(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11212456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines on tonsillectomy: a three cycle audit of clinical record keeping and adherence to national guidelines.
    Williams A; Lee P; Kerr A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Jun; 116(6):453-4. PubMed ID: 12385359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of operative notes at a general surgery unit.
    Rogers A; Bunting M; Atherstone A
    S Afr Med J; 2008 Sep; 98(9):726-8. PubMed ID: 19113057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician involvement enhances coding accuracy to ensure national standards: an initiative to improve awareness among new junior trainees.
    Nallasivan S; Gillott T; Kamath S; Blow L; Goddard V
    J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2011 Jun; 41(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 21677911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma--completion of the audit cycle.
    Nicopoullos JD; Karrar S; Gour A; Panter K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12881077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality assurance committee in a general hospital: its use in improvement of the medical record.
    Ashkenazi A; Cooper M; Chemke J; Simon D; Cohen C; Mass N; Schattner A
    Isr J Med Sci; 1992 Oct; 28(10):714-7. PubMed ID: 1399501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Documentation in orthopaedic surgery - do integrated care pathways work?
    Crawford JR; Shanahan M
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 May; 85(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 12831495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving communication between hospital and community physicians. Feasibility study of a handwritten, faxed hospital discharge summary. Discharge Summary Study Group.
    Paterson JM; Allega RL
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Dec; 45():2893-9. PubMed ID: 10626055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.