These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8423133)

  • 1. Retrotransfer in Escherichia coli conjugation: bidirectional exchange or de novo mating?
    Heinemann JA; Ankenbauer RG
    J Bacteriol; 1993 Feb; 175(3):583-8. PubMed ID: 8423133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanism of retrotransfer in conjugation: prior transfer of the conjugative plasmid is required.
    Sia EA; Kuehner DM; Figurski DH
    J Bacteriol; 1996 Mar; 178(5):1457-64. PubMed ID: 8631725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrotransfer of IncP plasmid R751 from Escherichia coli maxicells: evidence for the genetic sufficiency of self-transferable plasmids for bacterial conjugation.
    Heinemann JA; Ankenbauer RG
    Mol Microbiol; 1993 Oct; 10(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7968518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doing the conjugative two-step: evidence of recipient autonomy in retrotransfer.
    Heinemann JA; Scott HE; Williams M
    Genetics; 1996 Jul; 143(3):1425-35. PubMed ID: 8807313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A colI-specified product, synthesized in newly infected recipients, limits the amount of DNA transferred during conjugation of Escherichia coli K-12.
    Boulnois GJ; Wilkins BM
    J Bacteriol; 1978 Jan; 133(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 338575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of the mechanism of retrotransfer by mechanistic mathematical modeling.
    Top E; Vanrolleghem P; Mergeay M; Verstraete W
    J Bacteriol; 1992 Sep; 174(18):5953-60. PubMed ID: 1522069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of conjugative plasmids and bacteriophage lambda occurs in the presence of antibiotics that prevent de novo gene expression.
    Cooper TF; Heinemann JA
    Plasmid; 2000 Mar; 43(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 10686138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chromosomal gene capture mediated by the Pseudomonas putida TOL catabolic plasmid.
    Ramos-González MI; Ramos-Díaz MA; Ramos JL
    J Bacteriol; 1994 Aug; 176(15):4635-41. PubMed ID: 8045894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role and specificity of plasmid RP4-encoded DNA primase in bacterial conjugation.
    Merryweather A; Barth PT; Wilkins BM
    J Bacteriol; 1986 Jul; 167(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 3522540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of donor-recipient relatedness on the plasmid conjugation frequency: a meta-analysis.
    Alderliesten JB; Duxbury SJN; Zwart MP; de Visser JAGM; Stegeman A; Fischer EAJ
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 May; 20(1):135. PubMed ID: 32456625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined treatment with the antibiotics kanamycin and streptomycin promotes the conjugation of Escherichia coli.
    Zhang PY; Xu PP; Xia ZJ; Wang J; Xiong J; Li YZ
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2013 Nov; 348(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 24111668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacterial conjugative transfer: visualization of successful mating pairs and plasmid establishment in live Escherichia coli.
    Lawley TD; Gordon GS; Wright A; Taylor DE
    Mol Microbiol; 2002 May; 44(4):947-56. PubMed ID: 12010490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ti plasmid conjugation is independent of vir: reconstitution of the tra functions from pTiC58 as a binary system.
    Cook DM; Li PL; Ruchaud F; Padden S; Farrand SK
    J Bacteriol; 1997 Feb; 179(4):1291-7. PubMed ID: 9023214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Escherichia coli genes affecting recipient ability in plasmid conjugation: are there any?
    Pérez-Mendoza D; de la Cruz F
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Feb; 10():71. PubMed ID: 19203375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic evidence of protein transfer during bacterial conjugation.
    Heinemann JA
    Plasmid; 1999 May; 41(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 10366529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential of predominant activated sludge bacteria as recipients in conjugative plasmid transfer.
    Inoue D; Sei K; Soda S; Ike M; Fujita M
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2005 Dec; 100(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 16473767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conjugative junctions in RP4-mediated mating of Escherichia coli.
    Samuels AL; Lanka E; Davies JE
    J Bacteriol; 2000 May; 182(10):2709-15. PubMed ID: 10781537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrotransfer of DNA in the rhizosphere.
    Ronchel MC; Ramos-Díaz MA; Ramos JL
    Environ Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 2(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 11200433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacterial conjugation mediated by plasmid RP4: RSF1010 mobilization, donor-specific phage propagation, and pilus production require the same Tra2 core components of a proposed DNA transport complex.
    Haase J; Lurz R; Grahn AM; Bamford DH; Lanka E
    J Bacteriol; 1995 Aug; 177(16):4779-91. PubMed ID: 7642506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lipopolysaccharide of recipient cells is a specific receptor for PilV proteins, selected by shufflon DNA rearrangement, in liquid matings with donors bearing the R64 plasmid.
    Ishiwa A; Komano T
    Mol Gen Genet; 2000 Feb; 263(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 10732685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.