These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8423259)

  • 21. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry].
    Kiessling J; Pfreimer C; Schubert M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intensity resolution and loudness in broadband noise.
    Schlauch RS; Harvey S; Lanthier N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1895-902. PubMed ID: 7593914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing.
    Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Nov; 74(5):1375-9. PubMed ID: 6643849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Loudness functions with air and bone conduction stimulation in normal-hearing subjects using a categorical loudness scaling procedure.
    Stenfelt S; Zeitooni M
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():85-92. PubMed ID: 23562775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.
    Spirrov D; Van Eeckhoutte M; Van Deun L; Francart T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195412. PubMed ID: 29617421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceived lateral position of narrow-band noise in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners under conditions of equal sensation level and sound-pressure level.
    Simon HJ; Aleksandrovsky I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1821-6. PubMed ID: 9301059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intensity discrimination and auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Gallégo S; Micheyl C
    Behav Neurosci; 1998 Aug; 112(4):793-9. PubMed ID: 9733187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 4046585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.
    van Beurden M; Boymans M; van Geleuken M; Oetting D; Kollmeier B; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805690. PubMed ID: 30353784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mid-bandwidth loudness depression in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hots J; Jarzombek K; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2334. PubMed ID: 27250129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporal integration of acoustic energy.
    Pedersen CB; Salomon G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(5-6):417-23. PubMed ID: 888677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Spirrov D; Wouters J; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805363. PubMed ID: 30334496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On loudness at threshold.
    Buus S; Müsch H; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):399-410. PubMed ID: 9670532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pure-tone pitch anomalies. II. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in impaired ears.
    Burns EM; Turner C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1530-40. PubMed ID: 3711452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rose MM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1768-78. PubMed ID: 9301054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Rasetshwane DM; Trevino AC; Gombert JN; Liebig-Trehearn L; Kopun JG; Jesteadt W; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1899-913. PubMed ID: 25920842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.