108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8423749)
21. Effect of mode selection when using leg-to-leg BIA to estimate body fat in collegiate wrestlers.
Dixon CB; Deitrick RW; Cutrufello PT; Drapeau LL; Lovallo SJ
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2006 Jun; 46(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 16823357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimation of minimal wrestling weight using measures of body build and body composition.
Thorland WG; Johnson GO; Cisar CJ; Housh TJ
Int J Sports Med; 1987 Dec; 8(6):365-70. PubMed ID: 3429079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of hand-to-hand bioimpedance and anthropometry equations versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat percentage in 17-18-year-old conscripts.
Lintsi M; Kaarma H; Kull I
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Mar; 24(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15056180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Midwest wrestling study: prediction of minimal weight for high school wrestlers.
Thorland WG; Tipton CM; Lohman TG; Bowers RW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Kelly JM; Oppliger RA; Tcheng TK
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Sep; 23(9):1102-10. PubMed ID: 1943633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measurement of body fat in elderly subjects by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance, and anthropometry.
Svendsen OL; Haarbo J; Heitmann BL; Gotfredsen A; Christiansen C
Am J Clin Nutr; 1991 May; 53(5):1117-23. PubMed ID: 2021122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of ultrasound in assessing body composition of high school wrestlers.
Utter AC; Hager ME
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 May; 40(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 18408602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability and validity of body composition measures in female athletes.
Fornetti WC; Pivarnik JM; Foley JM; Fiechtner JJ
J Appl Physiol (1985); 1999 Sep; 87(3):1114-22. PubMed ID: 10484585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of four methods to assess body composition in women.
Eaton AW; Israel RG; O'Brien KF; Hortobagyi T; McCammon MR
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 May; 47(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8319671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity of the BOD POD for assessing body composition in athletic high school boys.
Moon JR; Tobkin SE; Costa PB; Smalls M; Mieding WK; O'Kroy JA; Zoeller RF; Stout JR
J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan; 22(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 18296985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis: a valuable tool for the measurement of body composition in children.
Tyrrell VJ; Richards G; Hofman P; Gillies GF; Robinson E; Cutfield WS
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Feb; 25(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 11410831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparison of body fat using anthropometry bioelectrical impedance and DEXA in elderly women].
Barbosa AR; Santarém JM; Jacob Filho W; Meirelles ES; Marucci JM
Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2001 Mar; 51(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11519527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fat-free mass prediction equations for bioelectric impedance analysis compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese adolescents: a validation study.
Hofsteenge GH; Chinapaw MJ; Weijs PJ
BMC Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 15():158. PubMed ID: 26471899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictive validity of four bioelectrical impedance equations in determining percent fat mass in overweight and obese children.
Cleary J; Daniells S; Okely AD; Batterham M; Nicholls J
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Jan; 108(1):136-9. PubMed ID: 18156000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measurement of body composition in chronic renal failure: comparison of skinfold anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Woodrow G; Oldroyd B; Smith MA; Turney JH
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 May; 50(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 8735310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The body composition and physical dimensions of 9- to 12-year-old experienced wrestlers.
Sady SP; Thomson WH; Savage M; Petratis M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1982; 14(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 7109894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis to hydrostatic weighing in male body builders.
Volpe SL; Melanson EL; Kline G
Acta Diabetol; 2010 Mar; 47(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 19219400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating percent fat in males.
Eckerson JM; Stout JR; Housh TJ; Johnson GO
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1996 Apr; 28(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 8778560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Iowa wrestling study: cross-validation of the Tcheng-Tipton minimal weight prediction formulas for high school wrestlers.
Oppliger RA; Tipton CM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1988 Jun; 20(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 3386512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of ultrasound techniques applied to body fat measurement. A comparison between ultrasound techniques, air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Pineau JC; Guihard-Costa AM; Bocquet M
Ann Nutr Metab; 2007; 51(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 18025814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating fat-free weight in lean males.
Eckerson JM; Housh TJ; Johnson GO
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Nov; 24(11):1298-302. PubMed ID: 1435182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
