These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8423945)

  • 21. Cross-over trial of fetal heart rate response to halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Bolnick JM; Garcia G; Fletcher BG; Rayburn WF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr; 19(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 16854694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vibroacoustic stimulation and fetal hiccoughs.
    Goldkrand JW; Farkouh L
    J Perinatol; 1991 Dec; 11(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 1770387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The effects of vibratory acoustic stimulation on fetal heart rate and body movement of normal fetuses at different gestational ages].
    Li Z; Wu M; Du B
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Mar; 32(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 9596883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vivo intrauterine sound pressure and temperature measurements during magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 T) in pregnant ewes.
    Ruckhäberle E; Nekolla SG; Ganter C; Schneider KT; Peter A; Raidt A; Kovacs L; Brockmeier SJ; Schwaiger M; Oberhoffer R; Papadopulos NA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18753758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lateralization during the Weber test: animal experiments.
    Sichel JY; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Mar; 112(3):542-6. PubMed ID: 12148868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vibroacoustic stimulation in normal term human pregnancy.
    D'Elia A; Pighetti M; Vanacore F; Fabbrocini G; Arpaia L
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 May; 81(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 15935921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vibroacoustic-induced fetal movement: two stimuli and two methods of scoring.
    Kisilevsky BS; Kilpatrick KL; Low JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 8423943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fetal sensory-elicited body movements differ in breech compared to cephalic position.
    Van der Meulen JA; Davies GA; Kisilevsky BS
    Dev Psychobiol; 2008 Jul; 50(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 18551470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vibroacoustic stimulation in abnormal biophysical profile: verification of facilitation of fetal well-being.
    Papadopoulos VG; Decavalas GO; Kondakis XG; Beratis NG
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Mar; 83(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16860496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vibroacoustic stimuli and fetal behavior.
    Devoe L
    Nurs Times; 1991 Jul 17-23; 87(29):36-7. PubMed ID: 1866261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vibration of the abdominal segment in pregnant sheep.
    Abrams RM; Gerhardt KJ
    Semin Perinatol; 1996 Feb; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 8899912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of labor analgesia with nalbuphine hydrochloride on fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Poehlmann S; Pinette M; Stubblefield P
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Oct; 40(10):707-10. PubMed ID: 8551472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Maternal perception of sound provoked fetal movement for antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Chittacharoen A; Herabutya Y; Tungsagonwattana S; Suthutvoravut S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Dec; 23(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 9433045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response.
    Eller DP; Robinson LJ; Newman RB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 167(4 Pt 1):1137-9. PubMed ID: 1415406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vibroacoustic stimulation with a complex signal: effect on behavioral state in fetal sheep.
    Abrams RM; Schwab M; Gerhardt KJ; Bauer R; Peters AJ
    Biol Neonate; 1996; 70(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 8894081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tongsong T; Piyamongkol W
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 8169910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Methods, value and limits of prenatal hearing diagnosis].
    Müller H; Meinel K; Hampe K
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):435-40. PubMed ID: 8967264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurement of fetal responses to vibroacoustic stimuli. Habituation in fetal sheep.
    Leader LR; Stevens AD; Lumbers ER
    Biol Neonate; 1988; 53(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 3355874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of fetal exposure to external loud noise using a sheep model: quantification of in utero acoustic transmission across the human audio range.
    Gélat P; David AL; Haqhenas SR; Henriques J; Thibaut de Maisieres A; White T; Jauniaux E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):343.e1-343.e11. PubMed ID: 31152712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combination of vibroacoustic stimulation and acute variables of mFBP as a simple assessment method of low-risk fetuses.
    Petrović O; Finderle A; Prodan M; Skunca E; Prpić I; Zaputović S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Feb; 22(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 19253163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.