These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8426452)

  • 21. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
    Needleman HL
    Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Verdict in sight in the "Baltimore case".
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4998):1168-72. PubMed ID: 1900949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Margot O'Toole's record of events.
    O'Toole M
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6323):180-3. PubMed ID: 1645847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Academic and scientific misconduct: issues for nursing educators.
    Hansen BC; Hansen KD
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 7844280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imanishi-Kari case. Marathon hearing gets under way.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1561. PubMed ID: 7777851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What to do about scientific misconduct.
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
    Poon P
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Baltimore throws in the towel.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 May; 252(5007):768, 770. PubMed ID: 1851328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The aftermath of the Gallo case.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(7):848. PubMed ID: 1640594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. NIH misconduct procedures: effect of new ruling.
    Hallum JV; Hadley SW
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1296. PubMed ID: 2003214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.