These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity. Needleman HL Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Verdict in sight in the "Baltimore case". Hamilton DP Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4998):1168-72. PubMed ID: 1900949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. What to do about scientific misconduct. Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower. Poon P J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Baltimore throws in the towel. Hamilton DP Science; 1991 May; 252(5007):768, 770. PubMed ID: 1851328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The aftermath of the Gallo case. Anderson C Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus. Hilts P N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI. Anderson C Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct. Marwick C JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(7):848. PubMed ID: 1640594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]