These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Science and scandal: what can be done about scientific misconduct? Robinson A CMAJ; 1994 Sep; 151(6):831-4. PubMed ID: 8087757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US drops Imanishi-Kari investigation; Baltimore withdraws Cell retraction. Anderson C; Watson T Nature; 1992 Jul; 358(6383):177. PubMed ID: 1630478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Warm praise for a whistle-blower. Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552. PubMed ID: 2011730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cornell University scientists face charges of fraud. Ready T Nat Med; 2005 Aug; 11(8):810. PubMed ID: 16079859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law. Sise CB San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracting the teeth from the False Claims Act. Walter C; Richards EP IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1997; 16(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 9158993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific publishing. Congress puts similar heat on NIH. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Jul; 305(5683):458. PubMed ID: 15273365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. NIH: Imanishi-Kari guilty. Anderson C Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6316):262-3. PubMed ID: 2008203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud squad moves in on universities. Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct. MIT terminates researcher over data fabrication. Couzin J Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5749):758. PubMed ID: 16272088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime? Redman BK; Merz JF Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics opinion: conflicts of interest in presentations and publications and dietetics research. Woteki CE J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Jan; 106(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16390663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process. Vastag B J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):374-6. PubMed ID: 16537825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific publishing. NIH wants public access to papers 'as soon as possible'. Kaiser J Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):825. PubMed ID: 15705812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific publishing. Seeking advice on 'open access,' NIH gets an earful. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5685):764. PubMed ID: 15297639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific publishing. Zerhouni plans a nudge toward open access. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5689):1386. PubMed ID: 15353768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The aftermath of scientific fraud. Bonetta L Cell; 2006 Mar; 124(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 16530031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]