These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8426870)

  • 1. SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Wagner RF
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Jan; 38(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 8426870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unified snr analysis of medical imaging systems.
    Wagner RF; Brown DG
    Phys Med Biol; 1985 Jun; 30(6):489-518. PubMed ID: 29081545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for the analysis of ordinal response data in medical image quality assessment.
    Keeble C; Baxter PD; Gislason-Lee AJ; Treadgold LA; Davies AG
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20160094. PubMed ID: 26975497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rigid alignment method for secondary analyses of optical coherence tomography volumes.
    Cornelio A; Collazo Martinez A; Lu H; Jones C; Kashani AH
    Biomed Opt Express; 2024 Feb; 15(2):938-952. PubMed ID: 38404338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic X-ray imaging with screen-printed perovskite CMOS array.
    Liu Y; Gao C; Li D; Zhang X; Zhu J; Wu M; Liu W; Shi T; He X; Wang J; Huang H; Sheng Z; Liang D; Yu XF; Zheng H; Sun X; Ge Y
    Nat Commun; 2024 Feb; 15(1):1588. PubMed ID: 38383659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance and usefulness evaluation of a software-based scatter correction technique for mammographic images.
    Kim K; Cho EI; Jeong HW; Lee Y
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24862. PubMed ID: 38312677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A scoping review of small animal image-guided radiotherapy research: Advances, impact and future opportunities in translational radiobiology.
    Brown KH; Ghita M; Dubois LJ; de Ruysscher D; Prise KM; Verhaegen F; Butterworth KT
    Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2022 May; 34():112-119. PubMed ID: 35496817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a priori noise characterization for real-time edge-aware denoising in fluoroscopic devices.
    Andreozzi E; Fratini A; Esposito D; Cesarelli M; Bifulco P
    Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Apr; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 33827586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing Stability of Crutch Users by Non-Contact Methods.
    Vairis A; Brown S; Bess M; Bae KH; Boyack J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33804014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO RATE MEASUREMENT IN FLUOROSCOPY FOR QUALITY CONTROL AND TEACHING GOOD RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING TECHNIQUE.
    Elgström H; Tesselaar E; Sandborg M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):407-415. PubMed ID: 33517437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel method to determine recursive filtration and noise reduction in fluoroscopic imaging - a comparison of four different vendors.
    Konst B; Nøtthellen J; Nalum Naess S; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 22(1):281-292. PubMed ID: 33315295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep learning for high-resolution and high-sensitivity interferometric phase contrast imaging.
    Lee S; Oh O; Kim Y; Kim D; Hussey DS; Wang G; Lee SW
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9891. PubMed ID: 32555276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The SIGMA rat brain templates and atlases for multimodal MRI data analysis and visualization.
    Barrière DA; Magalhães R; Novais A; Marques P; Selingue E; Geffroy F; Marques F; Cerqueira J; Sousa JC; Boumezbeur F; Bottlaender M; Jay TM; Cachia A; Sousa N; Mériaux S
    Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5699. PubMed ID: 31836716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signal and contrast to noise ratio evaluation of fluoroscopic loops for interventional fluoroscope quality control.
    Goode AR; Snyder C; Snyder A; Collins P; DeLorenzo M; Lin PJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):172-180. PubMed ID: 31593338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time algorithm for Poissonian noise reduction in low-dose fluoroscopy: performance evaluation.
    Sarno A; Andreozzi E; De Caro D; Di Meo G; Strollo AGM; Cesarelli M; Bifulco P
    Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Sep; 18(1):94. PubMed ID: 31511017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the Use of Automatic Tube Current Modulation on Patient Dose and Image Quality in Computed Tomography.
    Yurt A; Özsoykal İ; Obuz F
    Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2019 Sep; 28(3):96-103. PubMed ID: 31507141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study.
    Nakamura N; Okafuji Y; Adachi S; Takahashi K; Nakakuma T; Ueno S
    Radiol Res Pract; 2018; 2018():6192594. PubMed ID: 30643646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative investigation of a novel small field of view hybrid gamma camera (HGC) capability for sentinel lymph node detection.
    Alqahtani MS; Lees JE; Bugby SL; Jambi LK; Perkins AC
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160435. PubMed ID: 27537079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of beam quality for photon-counting spectral computed tomography in head imaging: simulation study.
    Chen H; Xu C; Persson M; Danielsson M
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Oct; 2(4):043504. PubMed ID: 26835495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of a channelized Hotelling observer model to assess image quality of x-ray angiography systems.
    Favazza CP; Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ; Leng S; Schueler BA
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Jan; 2(1):015503. PubMed ID: 26158086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.