These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8426879)

  • 1. On variability, Simpson's paradox, and the relation between recognition and recall: reply to Tulving and Flexser.
    Hintzman DL
    Psychol Rev; 1993 Jan; 100(1):143-8; discussion 149-53. PubMed ID: 8426879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm.
    Riefer DM; Batchelder WH
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 7476247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Tulving-Wiseman law and the recognition of recallable music.
    Gardiner JM; Kaminska Z; Java RI; Clarke EF; Mayer P
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):632-7. PubMed ID: 2266864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008).
    Nickerson CA; Brown NJL
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2019; 16():5. PubMed ID: 31788009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exceptions to recognition failure as a function of the encoded association between cue and target.
    Bryant DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 2017044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
    Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mathematical constraints and the Tulving-Wiseman law: a rejoinder.
    Gardiner JM; Nilsson LG
    Memory; 1993 Sep; 1(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 7584269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misleading Epidemiological and Statistical Evidence in the Presence of Simpson's Paradox: An Illustrative Study Using Simulated Scenarios of Observational Study Designs.
    Rojanaworarit C
    J Med Life; 2020; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 32341699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item-specific effects in recognition failure: reasons for rejection of the Tulving-Wiseman function.
    Lian A; Glass AL; Raanaas RK
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):692-707. PubMed ID: 9701962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide.
    Kievit RA; Frankenhuis WE; Waldorp LJ; Borsboom D
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():513. PubMed ID: 23964259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition failure and integration.
    Arlemalm T; Nilsson LG
    Scand J Psychol; 1994 Sep; 35(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 7939489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quantification of Simpson's paradox and other contributions to contingency table theory.
    Teuscher F
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262502. PubMed ID: 35202396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simpson's paradox in the integrated discrimination improvement.
    Chipman J; Braun D
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4468-4481. PubMed ID: 29160558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response to: Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008) by Nickerson CA & Brown NJL (https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-2).
    Gilthorpe MS; Tu YK
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2020; 17():1. PubMed ID: 32190094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Simpson's paradox unraveled.
    Hernán MA; Clayton D; Keiding N
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 40(3):780-5. PubMed ID: 21454324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context effects in recall and recognition at various retention intervals.
    Culross RR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1216-8. PubMed ID: 1501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visualizing Statistical Mix Effects and Simpson's Paradox.
    Armstrong Z; Wattenberg M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2014 Dec; 20(12):2132-41. PubMed ID: 26356927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normative and Descriptive Analyses of Simpson's Paradox in Decision Making.
    Curley SP; Browne GJ
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Mar; 84(2):308-333. PubMed ID: 11277674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Good for women, good for men, bad for people: Simpson's paradox and the importance of sex-specific analysis in observational studies.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2001 Nov; 10(9):867-72. PubMed ID: 11747681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory.
    Kormi-Nouri R; Nilsson LG
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 9701961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.