328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8427220)
21. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser.
Ma T; Marangoni RD; Flint W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9057621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ceramic bracket debonding with the carbon dioxide laser.
Rickabaugh JL; Marangoni RD; McCaffrey KK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Oct; 110(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 8876489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of the precrack preparation with an ultrasonic instrument on the ceramic bracket removal.
Chen YL; Chen HY; Chiang YC; Chang HH; Lin CP
J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Aug; 114(8):704-9. PubMed ID: 23856344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.
Klocke A; Korbmacher HM; Huck LG; Ghosh J; Kahl-Nieke B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 12970665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diode laser debonding of ceramic brackets.
Feldon PJ; Murray PE; Burch JG; Meister M; Freedman MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 20889051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.
Cochrane NJ; Lo TWG; Adams GG; Schneider PM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 28863911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laboratory evaluations on thermal debonding of ceramic brackets.
Sernetz F; Kraut J
J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 1812904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mechanical and electrothermal debonding: effect on ceramic veneers and dental pulp.
Lee-Knight CT; Wylie SG; Major PW; Glover KE; Grace M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9294354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions.
Bishara SE; Forrseca JM; Fehr DE; Boyer DB
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 7978522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives.
Bishara SE; Fehr DE; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 8338070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets.
Bishara SE; Fehr DE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8456783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Crooks M; Hood J; Harkness M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 9057616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro.
Suliman SN; Trojan TM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):651-6. PubMed ID: 25264580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of two laser motion modes versus conventional orthodontic ceramic brackets debonding technique on enamel surface topography.
Abdulaziz A; El-Kholy MM; Bushra SS; Ali SM; Shehab KA
Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 39(1):156. PubMed ID: 38869676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
