72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8427747)
1. Inability of refined CT to assess local extent of prostatic cancer.
Rørvik J; Halvorsen OJ; Espeland A; Haukaas S
Acta Radiol; 1993 Jan; 34(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8427747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transrectal ultrasonography to assess local extent of prostatic cancer before radical prostatectomy.
Rørvik J; Halvorsen OJ; Servoll E; Haukaas S
Br J Urol; 1994 Jan; 73(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 8298901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of localized prostatic carcinoma. A pilot study.
Rørvik J; Servoll E; Halvorsen OJ
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1992; 26(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 1631502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of CT in the staging of carcinoma of the prostate.
Platt JF; Bree RL; Schwab RE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 3496756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Computed tomographic staging of prostatic cancer].
Triller J; Fuchs WA
Rofo; 1982 Dec; 137(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 6218044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Staging of prostatic carcinoma. Accuracy of magnetic resonance].
Biondetti PR; Lee JK; Ling D; Vigo M; Fiore D; Macchi C; Borasi G
Radiol Med; 1987 Sep; 74(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 3659429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of imaging modalities in staging the local extent of prostate cancer.
Ebert T; Schmitz-Dräger BJ; Bürrig KF; Miller S; Pauli N; Kahn T; Ackermann R
Urol Clin North Am; 1991 Aug; 18(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 1877106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node staging of localized prostatic carcinoma with CT and CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: prospective study of 285 patients.
Oyen RH; Van Poppel HP; Ameye FE; Van de Voorde WA; Baert AL; Baert LV
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 8284375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Ruprecht O; Weisser P; Bodelle B; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):456-60. PubMed ID: 21354732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Results of endorectal MRI in local staging of prostatic cancer. Correlation with specimens from prostatectomy. Apropos of 47 cases].
Chefchaouni MC; Flam T; Cornud F; Thiounn N; Belin X; Deslignères S; Zerbib M; Moreau JL; Debré B
J Urol (Paris); 1996; 102(2):51-5. PubMed ID: 8796175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical application of MRI for urological malignancy. 1: Usefulness of various imaging modalities for local staging of prostatic cancer; a comparison between MRI, CT and transrectal ultrasonography].
Nishimura K; Kita Y; Arai Y; Oishi K; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Kakano Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Dec; 34(12):2083-9. PubMed ID: 3071121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of CT to reduce understaging in prostatic cancer: comparison with conventional staging techniques.
Emory TH; Reinke DB; Hill AL; Lange PH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Aug; 141(2):351-4. PubMed ID: 6603132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection and localization of prostate cancer: correlation of (11)C-choline PET/CT with histopathologic step-section analysis.
Farsad M; Schiavina R; Castellucci P; Nanni C; Corti B; Martorana G; Canini R; Grigioni W; Boschi S; Marengo M; Pettinato C; Salizzoni E; Monetti N; Franchi R; Fanti S
J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1642-9. PubMed ID: 16204714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of transrectal ultrasound in determining the T-stage of prostate cancer].
Hofmockel G; Wirth MP; Manseck A; Frohmüller HG
Urologe A; 1993 Sep; 32(5):407-10. PubMed ID: 8212426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging--early experience.
Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 16304091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Van Poppel H; Ameye F; Oyen R; Van de Voorde W; Baert L
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 1426296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between conventional imaging (abdominal-pelvic computed tomography and bone scan) and [(18)F]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for the initial staging of patients with intermediate- tohigh-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis.
Evangelista L; Cimitan M; Zattoni F; Guttilla A; Zattoni F; Saladini G
Scand J Urol; 2015; 49(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 25649494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of CT and CT-guided nodal biopsy in staging of prostatic cancer.
Amis ES
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):309-10. PubMed ID: 8284373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Transrectal ultrasonography compared to histopathological assessment for local staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Enlund A; Pedersen K; Boeryd B; Varenhorst E
Acta Radiol; 1990 Nov; 31(6):597-600. PubMed ID: 2278785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
