These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8428416)

  • 1. Phosphor plate computed radiography: response to variation in mAs at fixed kVp in an animal model. Potential role in neonatal imaging.
    Broderick NJ; Long B; Dreesen RG; Cohen MD; Cory DA; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA
    Clin Radiol; 1993 Jan; 47(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8428416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of computerized digital and film-screen radiography: response to variation in imaging kVp.
    Broderick NJ; Long B; Dreesen RG; Cohen MD; Cory DA; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA
    Pediatr Radiol; 1992; 22(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 1408442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
    Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of simulated inflicted metaphyseal fractures in a fetal pig model: image optimization and dose reduction with computed radiography.
    Kleinman PL; Zurakowski D; Strauss KJ; Cleveland RH; Perez-Rosello JM; Nichols DP; Zou KH; Kleinman PK
    Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18430873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-dose radiography of scoliosis in children. A comparison of methods.
    Kalmar JA; Jones JP; Merritt CR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Apr; 19(7):818-23. PubMed ID: 8202801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art.
    Murphey MD; Quale JL; Martin NL; Bramble JM; Cook LT; Dwyer SJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 1727344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A method of estimating doses in digital luminescent radiography].
    Bick U; Fiebich M; Lenzen H; Wiesmann W; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1991 Jan; 31(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 2006256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
    Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The potentials of digital image-intensifier radiography exemplified by digital spot imaging (DSI)].
    Rückforth J; Wein B; Stargardt A; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 7579216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed Radiography Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Receptors: Effect on Grid Conversion Factors.
    Noble LB; Culp MP
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Nov; 89(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 29298916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.