These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8429095)

  • 1. [Accuracy in computer diagnosis of electrocardiogram].
    Atarashi H
    Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi; 1993 Feb; 60(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8429095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: Accuracy of data reduction systems for diagnosis and quantification of arrhythmias.
    Corday E; Lang TW
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):927-8. PubMed ID: 1093377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chronic ischemic heart disease: symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias.
    Russo AM; Beauregard LA; Volosin KJ; Waxman HL
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1992; 22(1):207-39. PubMed ID: 1728427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of screening electrocardiograms in the long QT syndrome.
    Krovetz LJ
    Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):985. PubMed ID: 11986469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [ECG interpretation by computer. How reliable is rhythm diagnosis?].
    Rosendahl L; Pahlm O
    Lakartidningen; 1994 May; 91(21):2140-2. PubMed ID: 8052000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post myocardial infarction stratification and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.
    Gomes JA; Winters SL; Ip J
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1993; 35(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 8418465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological principles of T wave alternans analysis: a unified framework.
    Martínez JP; Olmos S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):599-613. PubMed ID: 15825862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of advanced electrocardiographic diagnostic software for detection of prior myocardial infarction.
    Wagner GS; Maynard C; Andresen A; Anderson E; Myers R; Warner RA; Selvester RH
    Am J Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 89(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 11779530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Big problems in the arrhythmia care because of digital ECG management].
    Walfridsson H
    Lakartidningen; 2010 Mar 3-9; 107(9):602-3. PubMed ID: 20387761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A personal computer-based patient simulator for interpretative electrocardiograph quality control.
    Franchi D; Bedini R; Berti S; Palagi G; Palmieri C
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():96. PubMed ID: 8189156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new look at an old question-how good is the computer in the diagnosis of arrhythmias?
    Laks MM; Lobodzinski S
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Oct; 38(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 16216610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal-averaged electrocardiography and ambulatory monitoring.
    Greenberg R; Morganroth J; Zelenkofske S; Greenspon A
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1992; 22(1):47-69. PubMed ID: 1728436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The human face of computers: necessary at present.
    Tonkin A
    Med J Aust; 1989 Oct; 151(8):425. PubMed ID: 2531837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance characteristics of a real-time arrhythmia analysis program on different databases.
    Young B; Brodnick D; Rowlandson I
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():25-30. PubMed ID: 8189134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of diagnosing atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram by primary care practitioners and interpretative diagnostic software: analysis of data from screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly (SAFE) trial.
    Mant J; Fitzmaurice DA; Hobbs FD; Jowett S; Murray ET; Holder R; Davies M; Lip GY
    BMJ; 2007 Aug; 335(7616):380. PubMed ID: 17604299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the normal values for signal-averaged electrocardiogram.
    Marcus FI; Zareba W; Sherrill D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 17338774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the lessons learned from the assessment of automated electrocardiogram analysis in the Common Standards for quantitative Electrocardiography study benefit measurement of delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images?
    Fayn J; Rubel P; Macfarlane PW
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 17478178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overreliance on computerized algorithms to interpret electrocardiograms.
    Hongo RH; Goldschlager N
    Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):706-8. PubMed ID: 15501211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A proposal for a T-wave alternans index.
    Madias JE
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6):479-81. PubMed ID: 17543326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society.
    Kligfield P; Gettes LS; Bailey JJ; Childers R; Deal BJ; Hancock EW; van Herpen G; Kors JA; Macfarlane P; Mirvis DM; Pahlm O; Rautaharju P; Wagner GS; ; ;
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Mar; 4(3):394-412. PubMed ID: 17341413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.