These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8429418)

  • 1. The ratio between vertical and horizontal changes of impressions.
    Lewinstein I
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 20(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 8429418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
    Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of impression materials measured with a vertical height gauge.
    Lewinstein I; Craig RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jul; 17(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 2213324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vivo investigation of seating and removal forces associated with recording impressions in dentate patients.
    Sotiriou M; Hobkirk JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 8809249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the setting stage on the accuracy of double-mix impressions made with addition-curing silicone.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jul; 72(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 8083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays.
    Boulton JL; Gage JP; Vincent PF; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Dec; 41(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 9008997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
    Corso M; Abanomy A; Di Canzio J; Zurakowski D; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tray modification for making impressions of mobile teeth.
    Çomut AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):341-2. PubMed ID: 23684286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
    Tjan AH; Li T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental impression materials.
    Perry R
    J Vet Dent; 2013; 30(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 24006720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impression techniques: clinical properties that matter.
    Nash RW
    Dent Today; 2014 Apr; 33(4):110, 112-3. PubMed ID: 24791295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
    Wang RR; Nguyen T; Boyle AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.