These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8429504)

  • 1. Amalgam restorations: a new approach.
    al-Duwairi Y; Hadj-Hamou R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8429504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Lacy AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1501170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonded silver amalgam restorations.
    Balanko M
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 1389344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Bonded amalgams. An important change in operatory dentistry].
    Padros Fradera E; Padros Serrat JL; Serrat Caballeria A; Padros Serrat E
    Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1991; 3(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 2064690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interproximal integrity of posterior partial-coverage ceramic restorations: sequence of delivery and finishing.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):807-18. PubMed ID: 10765857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of adhesive systems on the bonding of dental amalgam to glass ionomer cement.
    Nobilo MA; Consani S; de Goes MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9051598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of teeth with resin-bonded restorations.
    Stampalia LL; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS; Jones DW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jun; 55(6):694-8. PubMed ID: 3522863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 127(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 8708275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and nonretentive cervical cavity preparations.
    Kaplan I; Mincer HH; Harris EF; Cloyd JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 1403938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Fontana UF; Cury JA; Serra MC; Elderton RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Liebenberg WH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 62(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 8752648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive.
    Belcher MA; Stewart GP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Mar; 128(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 9066215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonded amalgam sealants: two-year clinical results.
    Staninec M; Eakle WS; Silverstein S; Marshall GW; Artiga N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Mar; 129(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 9529807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age.
    Lutz FU; Krejci I; Oddera M
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 May; 8(4):385-94; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 9028299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.