228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8430191)
1. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Sigeti JS; Foo TK
Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 8430191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.
Whitney WS; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; McDonnell CH; Li KC; Van Dalsem WJ; Low RN; Francis IR; Dabatin JF; Glazer GM
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 8234717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
Peterson MS; Baron RL; Murakami T
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 8888220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined gadolinium-enhanced and fat-saturation MR imaging of renal masses.
Semelka RC; Hricak H; Stevens SK; Finegold R; Tomei E; Carroll PR
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 1994422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hepatic lesion detection at MR imaging: a comparative study with four sequences.
Blakeborough A; Ward J; Wilson D; Griffiths M; Kajiya Y; Guthrie JA; Robinson PJ
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):759-65. PubMed ID: 9169701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal MR protocol for hepatic hemangiomas. Comparison of conventional spin-echo sequences with T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and serial gradient-echo (FLASH) sequences with gadolinium enhancement.
Kim TK; Choi BI; Han JK; Jang HJ; Han MC
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):565-71. PubMed ID: 9240679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo MR imaging of the liver.
Mirowitz SA; Lee JK; Gutierrez E; Brown JJ; Heiken JP; Eilenberg SS
Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 2014277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-breath-hold fast spin-echo versus breath-hold fast spin-echo and spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR imaging in the detection of hepatic tumors: correlation with surgical findings.
Soyer P; Gouhiri M; Rondeau Y; Spelle L; Mosnier H; Scherrer A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1199-204. PubMed ID: 9129411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions: role of spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Hatanaka Y; Yamamoto H; Arakawa A; Matsukawa T; Miyazaki T; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8090922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of the brain: comparison of gradient-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.
Pui MH; Fok EC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 7677001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liver T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison of fast and conventional half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo, breath-hold turbo spin-echo, and respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequences.
Tang Y; Yamashita Y; Namimoto T; Abe Y; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):766-72. PubMed ID: 9169702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.
Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Barone RM; Lacey C; Sigeti JS; Alzate GD; Sebrechts CP
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
