These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8430191)

  • 1. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Sigeti JS; Foo TK
    Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 8430191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN; Francis IR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.
    Whitney WS; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; McDonnell CH; Li KC; Van Dalsem WJ; Low RN; Francis IR; Dabatin JF; Glazer GM
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 8234717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
    Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
    Peterson MS; Baron RL; Murakami T
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 8888220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined gadolinium-enhanced and fat-saturation MR imaging of renal masses.
    Semelka RC; Hricak H; Stevens SK; Finegold R; Tomei E; Carroll PR
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 1994422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hepatic lesion detection at MR imaging: a comparative study with four sequences.
    Blakeborough A; Ward J; Wilson D; Griffiths M; Kajiya Y; Guthrie JA; Robinson PJ
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):759-65. PubMed ID: 9169701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal MR protocol for hepatic hemangiomas. Comparison of conventional spin-echo sequences with T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and serial gradient-echo (FLASH) sequences with gadolinium enhancement.
    Kim TK; Choi BI; Han JK; Jang HJ; Han MC
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):565-71. PubMed ID: 9240679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo MR imaging of the liver.
    Mirowitz SA; Lee JK; Gutierrez E; Brown JJ; Heiken JP; Eilenberg SS
    Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 2014277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
    Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-breath-hold fast spin-echo versus breath-hold fast spin-echo and spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR imaging in the detection of hepatic tumors: correlation with surgical findings.
    Soyer P; Gouhiri M; Rondeau Y; Spelle L; Mosnier H; Scherrer A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1199-204. PubMed ID: 9129411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions: role of spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging.
    Yamashita Y; Hatanaka Y; Yamamoto H; Arakawa A; Matsukawa T; Miyazaki T; Takahashi M
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8090922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging of the brain: comparison of gradient-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Fok EC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 7677001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Liver T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison of fast and conventional half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo, breath-hold turbo spin-echo, and respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequences.
    Tang Y; Yamashita Y; Namimoto T; Abe Y; Takahashi M
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):766-72. PubMed ID: 9169702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.
    Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN; Barone RM; Lacey C; Sigeti JS; Alzate GD; Sebrechts CP
    Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.