These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8430472)

  • 1. [Frequency and follow-up of non-negative cervical smears in the counties of Storstrøm, Vestsjaelland and Bornholm in 1979-1989].
    Lynge E; Poll P; Larsen J; Schultz HB; Thommesen N
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Jan; 155(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 8430472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Follow-up of non-negative cervical cytological smears in the county of Funen].
    Dahl MB; Hølund B; Sørensen B; Ahrons S; Grinsted P; Poulsen EF
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5798-801. PubMed ID: 9782760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Screening for uterine cervix cancer in Storstrøm, Vestsjaelland and Bornholm counties during 1979-1989].
    Lynge E; Poll P; Larsen J; Schultz H; Thommesen N
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1335-8. PubMed ID: 1598706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
    Lynge E; Poll P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
    Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
    Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Less pap-2 results ('minor abnormalities') in the population screening for cervical cancer since the introduction of new guidelines in 1996].
    Bos AB; van Ballegooijen M; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Habbema JD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(34):1586-90. PubMed ID: 12224483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neoplasia associated with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology.
    Zweizig S; Noller K; Reale F; Collis S; Resseguie L
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 May; 65(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 9159344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the follow-up of women aged 50-74 years after cervical cytological Ascus abnormalities in cancer screening: adherence to clinical practice guidelines in Isere, France; 1991-2000].
    Billette-de-Villemeur A; Poncet F; Garnier A; Marron J; Le Marc'hadour F; Morens A; Rouault-Plantaz V; Ney M; Exbrayat C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Oct; 37(10):787-95. PubMed ID: 19782628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Fitzroy Valley Pap Smear Register. Cervical screening in a population of Australian aboriginal women.
    Mak DB; Straton JA
    Med J Aust; 1993 Feb; 158(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 8450781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
    Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Consequences of incorrect interpretation of vaginal smear tests in a screening program].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Poll P; Andersen PK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Apr; 156(17):2594-6. PubMed ID: 8016968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytologic findings in 13 cases.
    Zhou C; Hayes MM; Clement PB; Thomson TA
    Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 9801202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma.
    Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The significance of documenting clinical appearance of the uterine cervix in the cervical cytology form.
    Al-Kadri HM; Hajeer AH; Al-Hawashim NS; Salem HH
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1698-702. PubMed ID: 17106544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evolution of atypical gynecological cervical smears in a captive population].
    Vilches K; Escalona A
    Rev Med Chil; 1998 Mar; 126(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 9674300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervical cytology prior to demonstration of the cervical cancer].
    Vejtorp M; Madsen EM; Bock JE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1986 Sep; 148(38):2398-401. PubMed ID: 3765169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
    Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.